The Philosophy Of The Global Panopticon


Chaos is the term for the original state of matter before the Spirit gave it shape. The concept is found in religion and in hermetism and, particularly, in alchemy. Here, far from being a mere notion, it is a reality which can be actualized, or made flesh, at any time, e.g. at the end of a historical cycle or at any point in individual evolution.
Wordsworth Dictionary Of The Occult[1]



In the first part of APOCALYPSE NEVER I’ve already tried to explain how the NWO has worked and communicated behind the scenes to steer the world society into the way the Great Work requires. What we need to find are the ‘philosopher kings’, the individuals in history who have the right connections to all movers and shakers, but who are also equipped with the right intellect and hands-on mentality to write down and therefore further the plans. Those people are even more important than the people who finance it, because through their works we might be able to fully reconstruct the Agenda and extrapolate where exactly it’s going to. Because if we stay focusing on the people who are portrayed as our rulers—the Presidents, Prime-Ministers, Kings—we fall into their trap of following the stars, the champions, the celebrities and the puppets that are put out for us to follow. National politics is almost as much part of the ‘panem et circenses’ as the entertainment industry is. It have been the philosophers, the alchemists and in our time the leading scientists and expert advisors who have really made the world we’re living in today, not heads of state or royalty. The heads of state are projected as the supreme leaders, but in reality they are very dependent on their staffs and of course especially their [unelected] special advisers and mentors. Most of the long-term plans are designed, written down and woven into the scientific and legal literature by obscure and less well-known individuals who are members of certain councils and commissions. And this has been this way for a very long time now, in most nations. In MOB FOOL I go deeper into the history of the modern steering councils and commissions.

But what do they really mean with a Philosopher-King? And how are these selected or found? The basic ‘user manuals’ of controlling society, introducing new thought patterns and restricting dissent do exist, and are mostly tucked away  in private archives and libraries. Even some of the famous Greek philosophers have written about these issues in detail and some of it is thus even available in public libraries. But because every Age has many different variables, mindsets and beliefs, there have to be made ‘updates’ of these old plans, so that they are able to implement it in a way that suits our time and civilization. One of the most important public examples of this phenomenon I already mentioned in an earlier article, where Francis Bacon updated the outdated ‘Tools’ of Aristotle to the ‘New Tools’ for our Age. Also you will find that the great Greek writer and poet Homer has many similarities to ‘our’ Shakespeare. For instance in the great book The Greek Qabalah [1999] by an expert on Ancient History and Latin named Kieren Barry, we can read that there have been made many suggestions in contemporary literature that “Homer’s poems were actually the impetus and instrument for the adaptation and diffusion of the Phoenician alphabet throughout Greece”.[2]

In our Age the works of Shakespeare have had the same influence on the English language, which has made many people think that the volume, breadth and depth of his body of work couldn’t have been written by a simple ‘commoner’ without exceptional schooling. In the internet-age this is maybe hard to fathom, but put yourself in the shoes of a man in the time of Shakespeare; for most people their home village was the world. One of the main names mentioned as being the ‘ghost-writer’ behind Shakespeare is Sir Francis Bacon. But of course this man alone couldn’t have written all Shakespeare’s work additional to his own body of work, which is also extremely voluminous! Then it’s far more plausible that there must have been a whole team of ghost-writers writing under the name of Shakespeare, and probably also even under the name Bacon.

But there have been many more of those ‘updates’ of the main Agenda for running the world of course, and quite a large part of them has undoubtedly been kept below the radar, and new ones easily get lost between the torrents of published books, magazines and studies out there. The lion’s share of the books in history that have changed the world society have come from a surprisingly small clique of aristocratic classes and obscure priesthoods, with many additional authors who were given a slightly adapted and downplayed family history to make it all not too obvious that it stems from the same clique. Many have been portrayed as ‘self-made’ men and women, but in reality they came from aristocratic families or offshoots thereof. And sometimes individuals who have the right traits or intellect are picked up at young age and reared for their job in life. They really are ‘authorized authors’. In my first Apocalypse article you can find John Bernal calling such people “recruits”.

The Dominant Minority and their main philosophers and social engineers have all through history tried to train and rear the designated King [or Queen] to become the classic Philosopher-King, and they named him ‘The Great’, ‘Caesar’ or ‘Sun King’ or something else illumined. One of the most famous combinations is probably Alexander the Great and his mentor Aristotle. But the latter received his vast knowledge from his own mentors, with as most prominent Plato. But most of the Greek Philosophers and Sages also studied many years in more esoteric places in the Middle-East and Far-East and those sources have gone lost in the mists of time, probably not by coincidence. Even today some movers and shakers write about being invited to stay and study a while with unknown and obscure wise men, in for instance Tibet or Egypt. On the somewhat vaguely known early formative years of Aristotle the noted historian Will Durant lifted the veil a bit:

Aristotle himself seems to have become a member of the great medical fraternity of Asclepiads. He was brought up in the odor of medicine as many later philosophers were brought up in the odor of sanctity; he had every opportunity and encouragement to develop a scientific bent of mind; he was prepared from the beginning to become the founder of science. [3]

This is just one example, but with close scrutiny you will find that most of the key people in history have had similar circumstances and there is always at least one author or historian who hints at this. This might be the lead biographer but that certainly doesn’t have to be. You will often find that it’s a more obscure writer, who, as you find out later, is lesser known to the public but a higher initiate into the Mysteries. Sometimes this is publicly known, but more often you will have to figure it out yourself. But as I have shown in my earlier articles, this is certainly not impossible if you know your way around the archives on the Internet and universities. And for people to be picked for their designated task in the Great Work a good and long-term pre-planning is necessary, because if you pick a person in ‘year 0’ you must have to be sure that let’s say in ‘year 20’ or even later the person must be able to perform, otherwise the Agenda experiences delays. This has happened often, as could be expected, because it’s not easy to steer the world and it never has been. But with clever planning and enough intellect it’s certainly possible.

But let’s focus on our present Age. The book James I By His Contemporaries [1969] by the noted English historian Robert Ashton gives us some interesting details on how Francis Bacon—who has been called “herald of the New Age”—praised his King James I as being truly enlightened to the requirements as set out by Plato and hence Hermes Trismegistus. In authentic old English we read:

But your Majesties manner of speech is indeed Prince-like, flowing as from a fountaine, and yet streaming & branching it selfe into Natures order, full of facilitie & felicitie, imitating none & inimitable by any…so likewise in these intellectual matters, there seemeth to be no lesse contention betweene the excellencie of your Majesties gifts of Nature and the universalitie and protection of your learning. For I am well assured, that this which I shall say is no amplification at all, but a positive and measured truth; which is, That there hath not beene since Christs time any King or temporall Monarch which hath ben so learned in all literature & erudition, divine & humane.

But to drinke indeed of the true Fountaines of learning, nay, to have such a fountaine of learning in himselfe, in a King, and in a King borne, is almost a Miracle. And the more, because there is met in your Majesty a rare Conjunction, as well of divine and sacred literature, as of prophane and humane; so as your Majestic standeth invested of that triplicitie, which in great veneration, was ascribed to the ancient Hermes; the power and fortune of a King; the knowledge and illumination of a Priest; and the learning and universalitie of a Philosopher. [4]

So we learn that we have to look for individuals in history who have earned themselves the titles ‘fountainhead’—the original source of something—and Hermes’ concept of thrice greatest: being learned and illuminated as King, Priest and Philosopher. Illuminated as King gives one the power and wisdom to rule and further the agenda, Priest functions for getting to know the deeper esoteric knowledge to understand where the kingdom and world at large must be led to, and Philosopher functions for writing out the middle- and long-term plans to get there. For us the second and third are the the most important. The first one, King, has become less important because of the change in the system of leadership which has unfolded the last two centuries.

Unfortunately there have probably been very few individuals who achieved all three, and the ones who were are probably not so well-known as for instance King James I. But on the other hand, though, James certainly didn’t meet these three demands and Bacon surely knew this, being one of his mentors. James wasn’t even that fond of Bacon and his teachings. So it can also be bravura or flattery if someone is called illumined or thrice greatest or something like that. James is even well-known for stealing the ideas of his advisors and presenting them as his own. Mr. Bacon himself fitted the picture of being ‘thrice greatest’ a lot better though, and in the long run he has influenced the world many times more than his King, or any other king in history. Let’s see if we can come up with a few other and lesser known examples of Philosopher-Kings of the NWO, who at least meet two of the three demands: the Priest and the Philosopher [Scientist].


Take for instance the Magus Of Freemasonry, Elias Ashmole, the founder of the Royal Society. Initiate-author Tobias Churton notes about this mysterious but highly influential individual that there is

something almost biblical about this account of Elias Ashmole’s first appearance on the great stage of the world. The name of the child upstaged the local family tradition; his identity-to-be came from ‘on high’. That the name issued from the lips of a clergyman surely added weight to the unexpected cry. […] ‘Elias’ was not simply another name that would smell as sweet. Elias, better known to the scripture-read of today as Elijah, held a fascination for the religious thinkers of Ashmole’s time. Elijah had been a star of apocalyptic narratives for at least 1600 years. Elias was the ‘expected’ or coming one. [5]

Was Elias Ashmole the long expected initiator of the orchestrated apocalyptic agenda? Can he maybe be linked to the first of the Seven Seals of Revelation? In the article APOCALYPSE NEVER we’ve met James Harvey Robinson, who became one of the mentors of H.G. Wells. Robinson followed the path as it was dimly illuminated—hence the ‘science as a candle in the dark’ analogy which they often use—by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe in his Faust [1808]. Many great initiates had already tried to solve the Gnostic riddle of Faust, but were unsuccessful. And now Robinson had the audacity to tell the world that “the seals are all off”. If we look back into Goethe, we tend to find in him a real Philosopher-King, who at least met the two most important criteria. The argument that Goethe intended to set a long-term goal for future initiates seems to be vindicated by André Nataf in his Wordsworth Dictionary Of The Occult [1996]. This little book is packed with great obscure trivia about important higher initiates in history. Nataf quotes the in his time extremely high and well-connected initiate Rudolf Steiner, who claimed that “Goethe had, after long maturation, ‘attained the supreme mysteries’.” Goethe was of course deeply interested in alchemy, and especially the book Aurea Catena [Golden Chain] by Johannes Nicolaus Furichius. Nataf also tells us that Goethe, who was a high Freemason, had no qualms writing that “Freemasonry is a State within the State, and it is never advisable to introduce it where it does not already exist”. So this rhymes with what Manly P. Hall wrote about the Craft, as established in the FUNDAMENTAL PHRASEOLOGY, and Goethe might even have been his source for this knowledge. But what’s important for us to know in the light of this particular article, can be found in a quote by Christian Lepinte, who wrote that

Goethe’s thinking is dominated by the idea of a society of elects or initiates perpetuating a sacred myth…The poem Geheimnisse [Secrets] haunts his spirit. The monastic order, whose mysteries are revealed in the fragment of the poem, shares in the order of the Templars, in Rosicrucianism, Freemasonry and the mystic quest for the Holy Grail. [6]

The English translation Steiner gave to Goethe’s poem is The Mysteries, and it is featured on one of Rudolf Steiner’s archival websites with an additional interpretation by the Anthroposophic master himself. This might be interesting for a future article. Feel free to help trying to dechiper it.

But the fact that NWO-agents aren’t almighty and also can end up in disgrace can for instance be seen with Jesuit-schooled Freemason Franz-Anton Mesmer [1734-1815]. In a time when the item on the Agenda called ‘the animalization of humanity’ was already brewing in the minds of the initiates—for instance Kant wrote already about this in Anthropologie [1798]—Mesmer embarked on his sacred mission to prove ‘animal magnetism’ and magnetism inside the human body. At first the masses were interested in his shows, where people were made to form ‘magnetic chains’ and  thus nicely and cozy connected together through magnetism. But the peoples were not ready yet for this kind of hocus pocus on their bodies and minds, which were still perceived a bit too sacred to be given full access. It would take many more decades of continuous pressure and reinforcement to convince the peoples that humans really are only stupid animals, before the Dominant Minority could finally mark off this point as accomplished. With the advent of psychology the human mind finally lay bare for them to scrutinize and finally conquer. But although he didn’t succeed  in his spiel, in real NWO-tradition Mesmer did lay the foundations for his successors to build on, for both the mainstream scientific side: psychoanalysis, and the counter-culture or alternative side: hypnosis. Both these thesis and antithesis would later through their own effort achieve the necessary inroads into the end-goal of access to our minds. And still later they would merge with Freud, Jung and all the other brain-bashers, dream-shapers and woo-whisperers, to become one complete system of psychological warfare. Small steps at a time, like a little child.

But as said, poor Mesmer was shunned and denounced as an impostor and had to leave France around 1785. Again in the Wordsworth Dictionary Of The Occult we find an interesting passage, where Mesmer materializes as a very early ‘mind-snatcher’, bent to invade the collective unconsciousness of humanity to free us from our misery. The title of the passage is An Artificial Sixth Sense:

Mesmer’s magnetic passes were intended to restore lost harmony. Perfect harmony in all our organs and their functions is health: illness is the loss of harmony. However, the passes first of all provoke a crisis, an “attempt by nature to resist the illness”. For this reason, the crises must be induced: “When nature is not strong enough to bring about the crisis, it can be helped by magnetism…The revolution which is thus produced is beneficial when the patient is filled with a feeling of well-being and relief, and especially if the crisis is followed by favourable evacuation”. [7]

And so here we again see the recurring theme of lending Nature a little hand, if it would take too long to achieve the stated goals without. As soon as the people accepted that disharmony [chaos] equals illness, the way was paved for them to “provoke a crisis” or two in their ultimate revolution to conquer our minds. The New-Age gurus have been very copious and convincing that the collective evolution and our higher state of consciousness will be pure bliss and a relief of pain and sorrow. They changed happiness into well-being already a while ago. To make our happiness measurable and marketable, but it’s also interesting that they call the APOC2_mesmerof their electromagnetic force, as for instance the Internet, “the well”.[8]

Another funny thing is that the ‘translation’ of the name Franz-Anton Mesmer could be done as follows: Franz, derived from Francis, which is a name for both sexes. Anton is from Anthony, which is a pure masculine name. So we go from both sexes to one sex, and Mesmer is phonetically the same as ‘Mes Mère’, which is ‘My Mother’ in French—that good old Queen Bee again! So this would signify that also this Masonic mind-molder would be named for his task in the Great Work. And how else could it be, with one of his Jesuit mentors being Maximilian Hell, which translates like something as ‘maximum enlightened’. [He was from German descent, if he was from English descent his surname would translate of course differently, and not less interesting.] From him Mesmer learned to hypothesize “a fluid from the stars that flowed into a northern pole in the human head and out of a southern one at the feet”. And to explain the connections in the funny picture I‘ve added above, we also learn that even Mesmer already worked with electricity-like currents too: “The cures, which involved violent ‘crises’ with fits of writhing and fainting, reminded contemporaries of the recently invented electrical capacitor, the Leyden jar, which sent a fiery commotion through the bold (or careless) experimenter who discharged it by touching it”. [9] So we can rightfully say that the roots of Mesmerism trace back to Hell! We can joke too.

Another one of those fellows experiencing ‘fire in the mind’ was the Italian social-democratic patriot Giuseppe Mazzini [1805-1872]. In his time the progressives were the patriots, mind you. His good friend Alexander Herzen, whom we’ve already met in PEACE OF MIND, called Mazzini the “shining star” of the democratic revolutions of 1848. Is that phrase a foregoer of “point of light” perhaps? Mazzini became red-hot as soon as his mind set on revolutions, preferably worldly ones, and his mantras were ‘associate’ and ‘brotherhood’. As one Princeton scholar noted about the extremely big influence of Mazzini on what some would call the NWO-Agenda for World Revolution:

Mazzini’s ideas had an extraordinary appeal for generations of progressive nationalists and revolutionary leaders from his day until well into the twentieth century: his life and writings inspired several patriotic and anticolonial movements in Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East, as well as the early Zionists, Gandhi, Nehru, and Sun Yat-Sen.

It was Mazzini’s conviction that under the historical circumstances of his time, only the nation-state could allow for genuine democratic participation and the civic education of individuals. to him, the nation was a necessary intermediary step in the progressive association of mankind, the means toward a future international “brotherhood” among all peoples. But the nation could never be an end in itself. [10]

This is very important to understand, especially for people reading this who are particular nationalistic or rigidly conservative: if you look back into the people and families who constructed the concept of nation-state, you will almost always find that they agreed that this was only a temporary phase. And therefore it isn’t strange that their progeny and their intellectual acolytes are now in the process of dissolving this in their eyes outdated concept of a nation. So the “taking our country back” and “saving our Constitution” is probably, sadly, a stance without any real chance. Because thinking that with replacing a few corrupt politicians you can save your country is being consciously naïve, because the whole political system in the West has already been corrupt to the bone for a very long time. A 21st century update of the old systems and constitutions of nation-states maybe could be possible, but all existing ones have built-in backdoors and loopholes, because that was part of the long-term agenda. A good example of the ‘evolutionary’ progress of the Plan, is the aforementioned Mazzini being called an “apostle of nationalism” whilst also becoming one of the major pillars of the world revolution for complete world unity in brotherhood![11] You know who was also called an ‘apostle’ without being particularly religious? MAGGIE MACABRE.

One of the main influences on American and hence later on also European and Chinese education was scientist-philosopher John Dewey. Bertrand Russell called Dewey the leading living philosopher in America in his seminal tome History Of Western Philosophy. Dewey was an acolyte of the Fabian movement in the Americas and instrumental in bringing Darwinism into education. His pragmatism can be described is something like ‘truth is what works, what gets the job done’, in itself quite Machiavellian. In his book Reconstruction In Philosophy [1920] he tells us about the way the academic brotherhoods automatically led to globalization:

Associations of mathematicians, chemists, astronomers, business corporations, labor organizations, churches are trans-national because the interests they represent are worldwide. In such ways as these, internationalism is not an aspiration but a fact, not a sentimental ideal but a force. Yet these interests are cut across and thrown out of gear by the traditional doctrine of exclusive national sovereignty. It is the vogue of this doctrine, or dogma, that presents the strongest barrier to the effective formation of an international mind which alone agrees with the moving forces of present-day labor, commerce, science, art and religion. [12]

So here we see Dewey also already during the Interbellum pleading for an ‘international mind’, as did James Harvey Robinson [1923] and H.G. Wells just before World War II in World Brain [1938].




So we have somewhat established that important individuals in the NWO-agenda have often felt that they were in some way being driven by internal surges or flashes of light and insight remotely coming into their minds. The in his day very influential philosopher of science Hans Reichenbach wrote in his book From Copernicus To Einstein [1942] a bit cryptically on this issue. He tells us how initiates who are destined to change the world, he calls such persons a “seeking spirit”, seemingly experience their own divine fiery alchemical revelation in the mind. We of course wouldn’t expect less with such demiurges:

If it is difficult today to pronounce the name of Copernicus without thinking of a turning point of history, it is not only because the name is connected with a profound transformation in the science, but also because all our knowledge and thinking have been deeply affected by his discovery.

The Copernican conception of the world provided an explanation of natural phenomena, a cosmic order governed by laws.It was the destiny of the Western mind to absorb this worldview which so much corresponded to its innate tendencies of thought. Thus ends the first period of new physics; and with it has come a new method of inquiry to dominate the natural sciences ever since. The collection of facts is the starting point of investigation; but it does not mark its end. Only when an explanation comes like a bolt of lightning and melts separate ideas together in the fire of thoughtful synthesis, is that stage reached which we call understanding and which satisfies the seeking spirit. [13]

Reichenbach translates to something as ‘to extend the stream’ or ‘to pass from the stream’. The secret esoteric teachings have through the centuries often been called ‘the underground stream’, which opposes, but also dictates to, the ‘mainstream’. He was a prominent member of the Berlin Group, a group of influential social scientists, with among them for instance Kurt Lewin of Tavistock fame. They worked closely with the Vienna Circle, which were acolytes of the logical theories of Bertrand Russell and the new physics of Einstein. One biography tells us that during World War II, Reichenbach was occupied with securing “positions for colleagues at UCLA, in particular members of the Frankfurt School [Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer], who with Berthold Brecht and Thomas Mann became part of Reichenbach’s German intellectual circle in Los Angeles”.[14] We also saw Reichenbach describing Copernicus as a “turning point”, giving human thought a “profound transformation” because it was “deeply affected”. This all signifies some kind of alchemical process. The name Copernicus of course contains the element Copper, which is

one of the seven metals of alchemy. Copper (and sometimes bronze and brass) is associated with the operation of Conjunction and the element Earth. Conjunction is the fourth operation in alchemical transformation. It is the coming together of the opposing archetypal forces of the Sun and Moon or the King and Queen. [15]

Isn’t it interesting that Copernicus’ name is highly relevant to and connects with the legacy he left behind for humanity? This could also signify that Copernicus was the fourth important individual in a much larger alchemical process spanning multiple centuries. And if you even take it further, to the Three-Age System of human history with Stone Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age ultimately culminating in a coming Golden Age, then the whole of human history could be called an alchemical transformation! This would explain why the Greek word for human is λαός [Laos], which also means ‘stone’. Laos also has been translated as ‘the crowd’ and ‘the people of God’.[16] And it would shine light too on why Hermes [of Trismegistus fame] means something like ‘he from the stone-heap’.[17] And of course why the Mystery Schools through the ages always have been so fixated on stones and building. This historical alchemical process is, as far as I know, hitherto not yet described in the New World Order studies. It really is some food for thought, because it would signify that the whole of human history really has been ‘steered’ in some kind of way. So we will need to collaborate and share our knowledge in order to solve this gigantic cosmic puzzle.


Herbert Spencer, who together with Malthus paved the way for Darwin and Wallace, also received some sunny esoteric insights on exactly the right moment in history. Initiate historian Will Durant tells us this, in his own much lauded poetic philosophical language in his Story Of Philosophy [1953] :

When, in 1858, he was revising his essays for collective publication, he was struck by the unity and sequence of the ideas he had expressed; and the notion came to him, like a burst of sunlight through opened doors, that the theory of evolution might be applied in every science as well as in biology; that it could explain not only species and genera but planets and strata, social and political history, moral and esthetic conceptions. He was fired with the thought of a series of works in which he would show the evolution of matter and mind from nebula to man, and from savage to Shakespeare. [18]

In his book Variety Of Men [1966], Lord Charles Percy Snow wrote also about his personal encounters with Albert Einstein. Snow was a novelist, scientist and a real spider in the elitist web, who knew many important and influential people from all over the world. He called Einstein “the most complete of internationalists”, because he “broke away from the Jewish community” and “hated all separatisms and nationalisms: yet he was compelled to take his place as the most eminent Jew alive, the committed Zionist”. About Einstein’s theories of relativity Snow wrote:

It looks as though he had reached the conclusions by pure thought, unaided, without listening to the opinions of others. To a surprisingly large extent, that is precisely what he had done […] But, when he generalized the special theory so as to include the gravitational field, he did something that might not have been done for generations…It remains an extraordinary monolith[19]

This last sentence has quite an interesting choice of words, withAPOC2_einstein Einstein literally meaning ‘one stone’ or ‘a stone’, and Snow referring to Einstein’s greatest achievement and legacy in the same wording. The German translation of ‘monolith’ is literally Einstein! So do we have another example here of an important individual in the NWO-agenda who was born for his role in the Great Work? Lord Snow also wrote this about the worldwide public reaction to and acceptance of hero Einstein:

No one knows quite why, but he sprang into the public consciousness, all over the world, as the symbol of science, the master of the twentieth century intellect, to a large extent the spokesman for human hope. It seemed that, perhaps as a release from the war, people wanted a human being to revere. It is true that they did not understand what they were revering. [20]

As you can see, Time Magazine even named Einstein the person of the century. Which he of course only was for the elites themselves, because how has Einstein and his legacy really made a difference to the common people on the street? It’s no secret that Einstein was really made a public hero and that he was pushed center-stage, largely against his own will. Because contrary to most heroes Einstein was more of a hermit himself who wasn’t that good in public discourse, certainly not for large crowds of people he didn’t knew. He was really a slow starter and even considered kinda backwards during his school years. Until in some miraculous way he tapped into some higher stream of thought in 1905, and came up with his theories on relativity and in the end laid out the foundations of three major new physics branches: statistical mechanics, special relativity and quantum theory. Did he receive his flashes of insight while working in the patent office in Bern? We will probably never know exactly. What we do know, is that Einstein is nowadays also a big hero of the World Federalists Society, and the monolith is featured together with H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russell and other sweethearts on their website as main leading lights. They quote Einstein saying that there “is no salvation for civilization, or even the human race, other than the creation of a world government”. [21]

But with describing Einstein as a human messiah, a human being for the people to revere, C.P. Snow made another important point. Because it were godforsaken years after both World Wars, like a ‘Dark Night of the Soul’ in the alchemical transmutation needs to be. For more on this issue, see CLOSE TO PERFECTION. Was Einstein and his legacy in fact the ‘prima materia’ which started the alchemical process of the century? This would give another explanation to why the atomic bomb—of which Einstein and his work proved to be a main pillar—was dropped without it being really necessary. This because Japan was already largely defeated and would have capitulated anyway. In Freemasonry the ‘Ashlar’ is the perfect cubed stone that often signifies Progress. It signifies the stone or rock of their own soul, but also the world-society and the world-soul has to be worked on by the Master Builders until it is perfected. So the Builders will keep on felling the rock [hmm?] until it is perfected. And Einstein the perfect Ashlar is ratified as the start of the ‘new physics’, which end-goal is the evolution of Man into Superman. In Stanley CubeBrick’s movie 2001: A Space Odyssey this is portrayed as a monolith: the One Stone. [22]

In the greater NWO-Agenda one of the achievements of Einstein was that he helped reintroducing Pantheism in the West, and particularly in the scientific world. H.G. Wells was another important pillar in that, as were some other Fabians. Nikola Tesla was an early pillar of the technological inroads into Pantheism, and we’ve already seen in APOCALYPSE NEVER that Richard Dawkins was one of the main influences to combine this with biotechnology and information technology. In 1930 the well-known writer and Nazi apologist George Sylvester Viereck, who we’ve already met in HAUNTED HOUSE, interviewed Einstein and asked him if the people had to call him a Pantheist:

Your question is the most difficult in the world. It is not a question I can answer simply with yes or no. I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. May I not reply with a parable?

The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe. We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects.

That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God. We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations am fascinated. I by Spinoza’s Pantheism. I admire even more his contributions to modern thought. Spinoza is the greatest of modern philosophers, because he is the first philosopher who deals with the soul and the body as one, not as two separate things. [23]

But what he didn’t say [or knew] is that the long-term Agenda was to merge the body of humanity into one world-soul! In the book Alchemy & Mysticism by the German academic artist Alexander Roob we find some other connections with alchemy and the Great Work. The book contains many hundreds of depictions of esoteric and illuminated drawings, paintings and symbols with short interpretations and source information on them. This book is a great source for research, and the link to the e-book can be found in the endnotes. It has a short introductory essay which also contains some very interesting information and a concise description of an otherwise very broad and difficult subject. Mr. Roob tells us that the Greek philosopher

Empedocles also taught that all life lay in the movement resulting from the clash between the two polar forces, love and conflict. In the Opus Magnum these correspond to the two alternating processes of dissolution and coagulation, disintegration and bonding, distillation and condensation, systole and diastole, “the yes and no in all things“. (J. Böhme) They correspond to the two polar agents of Arabic alchemy: mercury and sulphur, philosophical quicksilver and brimstone, sun and moon, white woman and red man.

The climax of the Work is the moment of conjunction; the conjunction of the male and female principle in the marriage of heaven and earth, of fiery spirit and watery matter (materia from the Latin mater, mother). The indestructible product of this cosmic sex act is the lapis, the “red son of the Sun”. [24]

So here we find a few important ties. First the eternal battle or clash of the two forces, who are with us from the dawn of time in very many incarnation: dark/light, good/bad, male/female, heaven/hell, etc. In the third part of this series on the Apocalypse we will go into the reasons why the initiates always blame the female for everything bad, and equal her to Sin. What’s interesting is that Jakob Böhme is referenced in the above quote. He is another key person in the NWO-Agenda and another example of a ‘nobody’ who seemingly had no education or whatever, but who was thoroughly familiar with all influential minds in history. He himself said that he had God in him and that all his knowledge came from the Godhead, while the old Jakob had died in him. And through this inner God [demon?] he deeply influenced Swedenborg, Leibniz, Hegel and Berdyaev![25]  Böhme’s duality was “the yes and no in all things”, we read in the above quote. I think it’s quite interesting then, that in the binary language—which was partially philosophized and designed by Bertrand Russell—they also speak of the 1 as ‘yes’ and the 0 of ‘no’,APOC2_on clearly also being the male and the female. Ever wondered why they gave the universal symbol of putting ‘on’ the computer is a one entering a zero? The electric sex act, leading to enlightenment, that’s what putting something ‘on’ means. Please also take another look at the photo of the UN Security Council in PEACE OF MIND. Coincidence? I think not.

Another interesting part of the above quote is of course the “fiery spirit”, which is the most used description of the true revolutionaries: fire in the minds of men. The watery matter, could that be the waves of Aquarius, currents of electricity or electromagnetic energy? And does the Dominant Minority hope to surf these waves safely, or will they be more like a little child or baby floating in eternal freedom in watery matter?  Nirvana? Ah…Nevermind.

The third important thing we can deduce from the above quote is that the product of the “cosmic sex act” of marrying Heaven and Hell, ahum Earth, is the “red son of the Sun”. Could that be why they all like to depict red suns in their symbology? The Greek sage Euriphides and a breautiful drawing by William Blake give us a perfect bridge to the next chapter below:



Because of the structure of its wax cells, the bee appears to surpass the greater skill of the architect. But what distinguishes the worst of architects from the most expert bee is the fact that the bee has constructed the cell in his head before he builds it in the hive.
Karl Marx[26]

The new God will be green, a Deus ex Machine
A system like the Beehive; with workers, drones and Queen
Most people will think they’re hip, standing in line for their chip
Their virtual life will seem like a psychedelic trip


As we’ve seen with Einstein and Darwin, an important method theAPOC2_industryhive Dominant Minority in each era uses for introducing subjects into the public arena, is through stars and celebrities they appoint and push to the top. This can be actor, musician or scientist, whatever fits the bill at the moment. If a topic is controversial, like for instance Pantheism or the multiple sexual deviancies that have been
introduced the last century, they start out with paying or instructing comedians or musicians who will mention it briefly and recognizable, and later follow occurrences in drama-series or news casts. And by slowly increasing the exposure over time, people will get used to it and finally it will become normalized and even institutionalized. Simple Pavlovian conditioning!

Ivan Pavlov was also an example of a highly interesting and exceptional individual. As far as I know he himself wasn’t high on the pyramid, not exoterically and not esoterically, but he was certainly well-connected, for instance with H.G. Wells but also Stalin. Pavlov can best be grouped under “recruit” I think. But he was protected from somewhere very high to continue his work at all costs. Peter J. Kuznick writes in Beyond the Laboratory [1987] how in Soviet Russia between 1929 and 1932 the rigid ‘reforms’ took place that changed the country much for the worse. He notes that somehow scientists had a lot more freedom and were less rigidly treated. It’s possible that this was the case because Julian Huxley was in the country overseeing the buildup and constant reinforcement of the scientific system, as I’ve noted in APOCALYPSE NEVER. Kuznick also tells us about the unique situation Pavlov embodied in the USSR in the 1920s. He was in fact a Soviet citizen and in close contact with for instance Walter B Cannon, one of the leading American scientists in the 1930s. In 1923 Pavlov visited the US and was robbed during a train ride in New York of all money he had. This made him scared of the West and he wanted to flee back to the safety of Mother Russia. But, as Kuznick noted, much “cajoling by his American hosts, plus a substantial Rockefeller Foundation grant finally persuaded him to continue his visit”. But at this time, we learn, Mr. Pavlov was also already two years a protected species as decreed by Lenin himself! Kuznick explains that it

did not take the new Soviet government long to realize Pavlov’s value, despite his political opposition. In January 1921, Lenin issued a special decree “In consideration of the entirely exceptional scientific services of Academician I.P. Pavlov, which are of the utmost significance for the working people of the whole world”. The ‘Pavlov decree’, as it was called, represented the turning point in Soviet physiology. It established a special commission, chaired by Maxim Gorky, charged with the responsibility to provide Pavlov and his wife with the most congenial living and personal situation and to provide Pavlov and his collaborators with “the most favorable conditions for…scientific work”. [27]

So here we learn about a few peculiar things. Firstly that in Soviet Russia, where political opposition at that time gave you about the life expectancy of a Mayfly [no pun intended], Pavlov was treated as a prince, elevated above the normal state rules. Secondly that Pavlov was in service for the “working people of the whole world”. If you think that with this he meant the peasants and proles around the world, then you haven’t learned that much from reading my articles! Thirdly, it’s also very interesting that this ‘[inter]national treasure’ Pavlov was allowed to travel to the US in 1923, which was officially not really the best buddy at the moment. Was it because Pavlov was to visit the Rockefeller Foundation and the scientist who worked for it? From 1923 on he was financially backed by money from both sides of the Atlantic, so once again it was made to be certain that an important pillar of the NWO-Agenda would be fulfilled on time. That’s their tactic. That’s their technique. An open conspiracy, openly financed, openly protected, and openly published in the scientific literature. The compartmentalized and hyper-specialized scientists don’t see the big picture or don’t care, and the regular folks don’t have access to most of the material, or, of course, don’t care either. But some do. Very few.


The same situation as I’ve described above goes with the micro-chipping agenda. Since the fifties there have been published many books and studies about this, both warning about it or helping to implement it. For instance the above newspaper article is from 1989. But as you can read in several of my other articles, the plans for chipping the world population have been made in the forties or thirties, maybe even earlier. And if you want the world population chipped in let’s say 50 years, because you know people won’t accept it right away, you can plan going from start to finish through a few intermediary steps. First a radio, telephone and TV to get your technology inside of people’s houses. Then you do away with the fixed positions of the appliances and make them mobile and wireless, so that people can carry them with them everywhere they go. You could even jokingly call the first mobile messaging gadgets ‘buzzers’, making it fun for you and for your subjects too, because, well, it buzzes. {{BZZ BZZ}}. It worked before with shiny beads and  modern technological gadgets to earn the trust of indigenous people, so why change a winning formula?

The first electric buzzer was invented by Joseph Henry [1798-1878]. After his death a statue was erected for him in front of the Smithsonian Institution in Washington DC. There was held a peculiar Masonic ritual during the unveiling of the statue, which was led by Bro. John Philip Sousa [1854-1932]. On the website of the NASA a short description of the ceremony is given:

Sousa was a Freemason, as were many ‘intellectuals’ of that time. His march was performed at a specific time and date: April 19, 1883 at 4:00 PM. While 10,000 people and representatives from many branches of government filed in a stately procession at this propitious hour, the planet Venus, invisible to the participants, had completed its arc in the sky and was setting in the west. At the same time, Virgo was rising in the east, and Jupiter was directly overhead.

Why did this time and date get selected for the unveiling of the magnificent bronze statue? In the mystical circles in which Sousa and the event organizers orbited, Venus was associated with the element copper, Joseph Henry had used large quantities of copper to create his powerful electromagnets, which at that time operated some of America’s newest technology. The connection of the ‘passing of Henry’ commemorated by the statue, and the ‘passing of Venus’ in the west may have seemed like a fitting bond between two separate worlds: human and cosmic. [28]

So here we learn a few additional things. Firstly that important individuals in the NWO-Agenda don’t have to be endowed with a particular name that spells their task in the Great Work, but that their creations, their handiwork, can also in some way be associated with their position. This makes it a lot more difficult for us, but we already knew that it wouldn’t be easy anyway. The second thing to remember is that they pinpoint their ceremonies to exact dates and celestial phenomenon. This is of course the stuff of thousands of ‘YouTube-researchers’ and their avalanche of absurdities, so we have to be extremely careful with sketchy subjects like this. Thirdly we find another confirmation that the guys at NASA sometimes can’t help to pull peoples legs, when they write about “the mystical circles in which Sousa and the event organizers orbited”. It seems that the people who plan-it in the NWO are also seen as being able to achieve a perfect balance between their forward motion [Progress] and attracting nature [Gravity].

Of course they didn’t forgot to put large sums of money into promotion of the electric gadgets and gave it snob appeal through celebrities. People first will look suspicious about it and will make fun of the ‘show-offs’ with their mobile appliances. But people will adapt, as they always do, and become more and more domesticated. So in time everyone wants to be that show-off and you become the pariah when you don’t follow the herd. And the people most hopelessly enslaved in the mass hive-mind will be suspicious to people who don’t have a social media account, people who aren’t an exact carbon-copy of themselves. That’s the nature of the mass man. The Dominant Minority also didn’t forgot to instruct their main executive companies to give their main tools clever names, like iPhone or smart phone. There isn’t a thing in the world that the me-me-me generation prefers to hear and think about than ‘I’, and combined with phone it’s a great conditioning tool. I+Phone, I+Phone, I+Phone…until in our minds it already starts to merge. And besides that, who doesn’t want to be smart? You can stop thinking for yourself because your phone is already smart!

And so all around us we already see people looking and cherishing their trinkets and gadgets in an uncontrollable and pathological way. You can almost hear them gibber already: “my precious!” It’s so beautiful, shiny, omniscient, people will do everything to APOC2_golemkeep looking at it, even while driving or walking. Even when putting their own lives in danger. People are willing to sell some of their body-parts to buy one, people are willing to hurt or kill another being in order to have one; most people have already turned into Golem. The only thing for the Dominant Minority to achieve then, is to convince the masses to connect themselves to each other. And with a peoples so incredibly lost and alone this won’t be difficult. I go much deeper into this issue and how to overcome it in ON THE MOVEMENT and TOGETHER ALONE.

The next step, and our present situation, is of course the wearable technology. This is meant to let people get used to having the appliance on the skin. The skin-phone also already exists, both through a bracelet or as some kind of tattoo. And from then on there is of course only one new ‘innovation’ possible, which is implanted under the skin. And for the implementation of the brain-chip they went from earphones to in-ear plugs to Google glasses, so you can get used to have the appliance fixated on your head. And then the brain-chip will be an easy and quick last step. The study  Ethical Assessment of Implantable Brain Chips makes it quite clear:

Wearables and body-nets are intermediate technologies; the logical next step in this development is the implantable brain chip, direct neural interfacing. As early as 1968, Nicholas Negroponte, presently director of MIT’s Media Lab, first prophesied this symbiosis between mankind and machine. His colleague, Professor Gershenfeld, asserts that “in 10 years, computers will be everywhere; in 20 years, embedded by bioengineers in our bodies…”

Neither visionary professes any qualms about this project, which they expect to alter human nature itself. “Suddenly technology has given us powers with which we can manipulate not only external reality—the physical world—but also, and much more portentously, ourselves.” Once networked the result will be a “collective consciousness”, “the hive mind.” “The hive mind…is about taking all these trillions of cells in our skulls that make individual consciousness and putting them together and arriving at a new kind of consciousness that transcends all the individuals.” [29]


I’ve referred to the global beehive or anthill already a few times in earlier articles. For instance in CLOSE TO PERFECTION we saw that there exists good evidence that makes scientists think that “there could still be a secret world of electric communication within the hive that we know nothing about”. I also coined the idea that the initiates of the West might be the bees and the initiates of the East maybe the ants. Influential Socialist ideologue Robert Owen even thought that humanity had to “follow the bees through five successive revolutions: noble savagery, pastoral occupations, farming, and industry on to the final creation of a community of goods by the wise bee”. For some reason the initiates through the millennia have revered bees and their hive structure. On the surface it’s only because the hive signifies the highest state of industry and labor in the animal kingdom, but as we’ve already seen there’s a much deeper side to it. Now let’s see if we can make the picture a little bit clearer, by a short outline of bee worship amongst high priesthoods and rulers almost since time immemorial.

Let’s start in Ancient Greece, and we simultaneously build further on what we’ve already learned on the Delphic Oracle in INTELLIGENCIA:

Tradition holds the famous Delphic Oracle was revealed by a swarm of bees, and the Pythia or divinatory priestesses in Delphi’s temple of Apollo were affectionately called ‘Delphic Bees’, while virgin priestesses of Greek Goddesses like Rhea and Demeter were called melissai, ‘bees’; the hierophants essenes, ‘king bees’. Great musicians and poets like Pindar were inspired by the Muses, who bestowed the sacred enthusiasm of the logos, sending bees to anoint the poets’ lips with honey.

The primordial Eurasian entheogenic plant soma/haoma, known in the Vedas as amrta, the potion of immortality, was called ambrosia by the Greeks, and with nektar, the other sustenance of the Immortals, was associated with bees and honey. [30]

Can you see how they are repeating history in great detail, reintroducing the same concepts and phrases in a slightly altered form so that it fits best in the experiences and mentality of our present Age? An important part of Aldous Huxley’s task in the Great Work was introducing the East into the minds of the people in the West, and he also used Soma in his Brave New World story. Nietzsche was also one of them. The stage plays of Euripides are also interesting, especially about the ‘Bacchae’. These were the followers of Bacchus / Dionysus: the God of wine, entertainment, promiscuity, etc. This was quite cultish and whole hordes of them roamed the lands while engaging in all sorts of orgies and drug use. Our equivalent is more controlled, namely the big music parties and festivals. As one study notes about these big Bacchantic shows in Ancient Greece: “The illusions conjured up in the theatre were themselves a crucial part of Dionysian worship, of altered perceptions, and crucially of ekstasis, or ‘standing outside yourself’.”[31] In our time everything is more scientific, so we have gotten the mass-produced XTC variant, also meant for us to experience and long for the needed perception of being one with the rest, and wanting to ‘stand out of yourself’. And of course the New-Agers took the bait completely and most of them have never really returned to Earth since. They aren’t a potential threat anymore for the Dominant Minority.

Another aligning Greek mythological thread that has been reintroduced in many ways, is that of the ‘Amazonians’. Much of the stories that have been preserved are probably exaggerated or only myths, but some of its main themes were fighting warrior women [Wonder Woman, Xena, militant feminism], who maybe even had beards [Conchita Wurst], cut off one of their breasts so that they could better carry their bag with arrows while horseback riding [Angelina Jolie?] and some other strange phenomenon. In the end they even killed men and had to have killed at least one to be qualified to marry! [32] Wait a few years and I won’t be surprised if they will let history repeat itself once more. It’s one of the main weapons of the NWO against us: divide and conquer.


The website of Napoleon tells us that for this esteemed ruler the Bee was “symbol of immortality and resurrection”, and

chosen so as to link the new dynasty to the very origins of France. Golden bees (in fact, cicadas) were discovered in 1653 in Tournai in the tomb of Childeric I, founder in 457 of the Merovingian dynasty and father of Clovis. They were considered as the oldest emblem of the sovereigns of France. [33]

I’ve mentioned the Royal Society before in earlier articles. It was the first scientific society with global reach and power, and is still one of the main centers of power in the scientific dictatorship. The early initiates of the Society were especially fond of bees, beehives and honey, as for instance Samuel Hartlib [the liberator of the Heart?] tells us:

Now Honey is a Vegetable Magistery, in part perfected by the Specifick virtue of the flour, &c. on which the dew falling, is made sweeter than of it self it was…but is compleated by the peerlesse virtue of the Bee, which doth transmute that sweetnesse into a new Creature, which is Honey. [34]

Yes, the Bees are the alchemists of the sky. The website of the Grand Lodge Of British Columbia and Yukon, one of the main online Masonic study centers in the world today, tells us that the Craft has

adopted the beehive as a symbol of industry, a virtue taught in the instructions, which says that a Master Mason ‘works that he may receive wages, the better to support himself and family, and contribute to the relief of a worthy, distressed brother, his widow and orphans…’ The ark has already been shown to have been an emblem common to Freemasonry and the Ancient Mysteries, as a symbol of regeneration—of the second birth from death to life. Now, in the Mysteries, a hive was a type of the ark. [35]

We now return to historian Will Durant and what heAPOC2_hiveflag wrote about the major evolutionary ideologue Herbert Spencer. He tells us that

Spencer believes that socialism is a derivative of the militant arid feudal type of state, and has no natural affiliation with industry. Like militarism, socialism involves the development of centralization, the extension of governmental power, the decay of initiative, and the subordination of the individual.

Socialism would be in industry what a rigid instinctive equipment is in animals; it would produce a community of human ants and bees, and would issue in a slavery far more monotonus [sic] and hopeless than the present condition of affairs. [36]

 The ‘Beehive Methaphor’—as the book is called where some pictures in this article of the Masonic beehives are taken from—was certainly well embedded amongst the NWO-ideologues in the nineteenth and twentieth century too.


It’s therefore maybe not surprising that the main datacenter of the National Security Agency [NSA] is situated in Utah, the ‘Beehive State’. This name was coined by the Mormons, under the initiative of Brigham Young. He even resided for a while in ‘Beehive House’ in Salt Lake City. Mormonism is of course somewhat of an offshoot of Freemasonry and certainly in its early days it had many resemblances. Author James Bamford wrote in 2012 a scathing article for Wired Magazine about the NSA’s Utah data center, and he ended the article telling us that in

his 1941 story ‘The Library of Babel’, Jorge Luis Borges imagined a collection of information where the entire world’s knowledge is stored but barely a single word is understood. In Bluffdale the NSA is constructing a library on a scale that even Borges might not have contemplated. And to hear the masters of the agency tell it, it’s only a matter of time until every word is illuminated. [37]

In the book I’ve just mentioned, The Beehive Metaphor [1998], by Juan Antonio Ramirez, a lot of information is given about the beehive as art and architectural object. One of the main architects/artists who is given attention in the book is Charles-Édouard Jeanneret-Gris, better known as Le Corbusier. This Frenchman was a highly mysterious individual who had a substantial but difficult to measure legacy on the fields of art and architecture. Ramirez tells us that Le Corbusier had

interesting ‘thoughts about Ford’ where he APOC2_revohivereturned to his ideas on industrialization and architecture, and extolled the advent of assembly line automobiles as if they were larvae who reach adulthood through the careful solicitude of the worker-bees (ordinary bees are called ‘workers’ in normal beekeeping terminology)

For Le Corbusier the good worker is intelligent, industrious, disciplined and hygienic. He seems to have neither prejudices nor defects. In one passage in Urbanisme he describes the construction of a dam in terms that make it sound as if he was describing the activity of a beehive rather than the work of humans. His ideas on how a modern building should be built are quite clear: ‘buildings should be factories with their workforce and machinery, their specialist teams. Bad weather and the seasons are then defeated’. The machine is the indispensable assistant that will allow the appearance of ‘those new men from the machine age’. And elsewhere: ‘Science has given us the machine. The machine gives us limitless power. And for our part, we can perform miracles of nature.’ [compare this with what John Ruskin wrote, as featured in OLD MAN OF THE MOUNTAIN—FS]

What is Le Corbusier referring to? Is he not thinking of a new kind of superhuman species that will acquire the finest virtues (and even some of the physical attributes) of hymenoptera? One such is the ability to fly.

Le Corbusier reproduced a quotation from Philippe Girardet, director of Peugeot, in which he stated that man is one of the slowest animals in Nature: ‘He is a larva who crawls laboriously over the face of the earth.’ This is an interesting comparison between the condition of our species and that of insects before they reach maturity: it is obvious that only the aeroplane can allow us to ‘lift ourselves up’ and emulate the bees and, like them, fly and achieve the social perfection of the beehive. [38]

So here we once again see a few familiar themes. First, the want and need for the common workers to be degraded—or upgraded if you look at it from their side—so that they can’t and won’t complain or revolt anymore. And we can also again recognize the simultaneous wish for a small part of humanity to become superhuman. Compare the last quoted paragraph also with the H.G. Wells quote on the “higher organism”, which somehow has to come out of a united humanity. This can be found at the end of my article CLOSE TO PERFECTION. It’s also interesting to note that in this example the Capitalist side of things is symbolized as bees and beehive, while this also allegedly is the end-goal of the Socialist side of things.

So it probably won’t surprise you that Le Corbusier dabbled deep in the occult and was particularly interested in Freemasonry. A very interesting book that goes deep into Le Corbusier’s sketchy past and his deep interest in Masonry is Le Corbusier And The Occult [2009], by J.K. Birksted. This author had to conclude that the Frenchman himself never became a Mason but befriended very many who were initiates, and that he wove the message and the symbology of the Craft into his own architectural writings. The book starts with one of Le Corbusier’s most well-known early statements, on his Dom-Ino House system of construction: “Intuition produces flashes of unexpected insight. Thus in 1914 the perfect and complete conception of an entire system of construction, anticipating all future problems.” [39]

Yes, we’ve seen many examples of flashy art and music. Queen Bee Mercury sang it quite convincingly in the theme for the 1980 movie Flash Gordon, the miraculous savior of the universe:

Just a man
With a man’s courage
Nothing but a man
But he can never fail
No-one but the pure at heart
May find the Golden Grail  [40]

At CERN they also like buzzing along as we know. But they’re also eager to resemble bees, as we for instance can see in one of their landmark buildings, the wooden beehive-like structure called The Globe Of Science And Innovation. CERN also recently won a prize for the best Swiss Twitterpage in 2015—what an honor and achievement for the world’s most cutting-edge scientific project!—which also depicts a golden fly or a bee or something in that category. [41]



In APOCALYPSE NEVER III we will see how this all ties back into the Book Of Revelation.






[1]  André Nataf – The Wordsworth Dictionary Of The Occult [Wordsworth Reference; 1996] / p. 231

[2]  Kieren Barry – The Greek Qabalah [Samuel Weiser, York Beach; 1999] / p. 9

[3]  Will Durant – The Story Of Philosophy [Garden City, New York; 1953] / p. 58

[4]  Robert Ashton – James I By His Contemporaries [Hutchinson, London; 1969] / p. 147, 148
The complete text is also available online.

[5]  Tobias Churton – The Magus Of Freemasonry [Inner Traditions; 2006] / ch. 1

[6]  Nataf – Dictionary Of The Occult / p. 207

[7]  Nataf – Dictionary Of The Occult / p. 156, 157

[8]  See for instance the 2003 documentary The Net; The Unabomber, LSD And The Internet

[9]  http://collections.stanford.edu/supere/page.action?forward=author_franz_anton_mesmer

[10]  http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i9042.pdf

[11]   https://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/d/559  [the link is not dead, paste it in Google]

[12]  John Dewey – Reconstruction In Philosophy  [Henry Holt, New York; 1920] / p. 205

[13]  Hans Reichenbach – From Copernicus To Einstein
[Philosophical Library, New York; 1942. Org: 1927] / p. 12, 13, 27

[14]  Hans Reichenbach – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Biography

[15]   http://www.alchemylab.com/dictionary.htm

[16]  See for instance here.

[17]  See for instance: Ratko Duev – Hermaphroditus; The Other Face Of Hermes  / p. 50, footnote 23.

[18]  Durant – The Story Of Philosophy  / p. 392

[19]  C.P. Snow – Variety Of Men [Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York; 1967]  / p. 89, 101, 105

[20]  Snow – Variety Of Men  / p . 106

[21]  http://www.wfm-igp.org/our-movement/historical-world-federalists

[22]  The wordplay on Kubrick I got from alternative researcher Jay Weidner, who has also written some interesting things on 2001; A Space Odyssey. But unfortunately most of his work is New-Agey with a certain degree of fairytales and misinformation. He’s among the better New-Age teachers out there, but the whole concept on which it’s built is part of the NWO-Agenda itself. The same goes with other researchers in this corner of the anti-NWO Movement, like Icke, Tsarion and Maxwell for instance. They are no conscious misinformants I’m sure, and they all have put out some interesting stuff, but the collective evolution thing and the aliens/annunaki memes originated by the Dominant Minoritythemelves.

[23]  As quoted on Wikipedia: Religious Views On Albert Einstein.
I advise you to read the full article, which is quite good.

[24]  Alexander Roob – Alchemy & Mysticism [Taschen, Köln; 1997]  / p. 25

[25]  See for instance: Nataf – Dictionary Of The Occult  / p. 112

[26]  Cited in: Juan Antonio Ramirez- The Beehive Metaphor [Reaktion Books, London; 1998]  / p. 6

[27]  Peter J. Kuznick – Beyond The Laboratory [University Of Chicago Press; 1987]  / p. 116, 150-152

[28]  http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/venus/VT10.html

[29]  Ellen M. McGee and G. Q. Maguire, Jr. – Ethical Assessment of Implantable Brain Chips

[30]  Jonathon Ott – The Delphic Bee  [Economic Botany 52(3): p. 260-266; 1998]

[31]  Euripides’ Bacchae Study Guide. See also: The Bacchae; Girls Will Be Boys.

[32] – See for instance here: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/amazon-women-

The Beehive; Feminism Contrasted With The Zenana

[33]  http://www.napoleon.org/en/essential_napoleon/symbols/index.asp#abeilles

[34]  Samuel Hartlib [ed.] – The Reformed Commonwealth Of Bees
[Royal Society Pamphlets; 1655] / p. 36, 37

[35]  http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/symbolism/bees.html

[36]  Durant – Story Of Philosophy / p. 415

[37]  James Bamford – The NSA Is Building The Country’s Biggest Spy Center  [Wired.com; 2012]

[38]  Ramirez –  Beehive Metaphor  / p. 137-139

[39]  Ramirez – Beehive Metaphor / p. 19

[40]  Queen – Flash Gordon Theme  [1980]

[41]  http://cds.cern.ch/record/2005303?ln=en