THE BOREDOM OF SKEPTICISM:
A Refutation Of RationalWiki's Silly Views On 'New World Order'

 

I recommend reading these articles first before you read the one below:

INTRODUCTION    +      DEEPER INSIGHTS INTO WORLD ORDER – PART I

——————————————————

The title of this article is a little play on the famous essay by Carl Sagan named The Burden Of Skepticism,  which set the tone for the Skeptical movement at the end of the 80’s. Sagan was one of the most well-known skeptical scientists and astronomers of his time, achieving center-stage through for instance his Cosmos series on television. The Skeptic Movement is sort of an antithesis that grew out of the dissatisfaction for the re-emergence of superstition, mythology and mysticism through for instance the New Age movement and conspiratorial authors of all sides of the political spectrum. While vigorously claiming that they base themselves purely on rationality and science, a large part of this movement also devolved into some sort of religious-like cult. And with the internet becoming ubiquitous this has become more visible than ever. Among the most well-known skeptic institutions is RationalWiki, one of the many Wikipedia spin-offs that have emerged since the start of the new millennium. This community places itself among the lower echelons of the Skeptic community, mainly by being hard in name-calling and offending but remarkably soft on conjuring up intelligent counter-arguments or even using science and literature to add some substance to their viewpoints. [1]  But their reach on the internet is wide and their influence on smaller skeptical websites and blogs is substantial. It might be constructive to add a small quote by Carl Sagan here, from his well-known book The Demon-Haunted World:

The chief deficiency I see in the skeptical movement is its polarization: Us vs. Them — the sense that we have a monopoly on the truth; that those other people who believe in all these stupid doctrines are morons; that if you’re sensible, you’ll listen to us; and if not, to hell with you. This is nonconstructive. It does not get our message across. It condemns us to permanent minority status. [2]

So this mindset is not new in our internet-age, but it does get magnified in our steadily virtualizing society. Strangely enough, the quote you just read is not featured among the Carl Sagan quotes on RationalWiki. [3]  This quote might help them in finally facing their own little demons. This is of course also prevalent in all alternative and conspiratorial movements. This us / them mentality is a big hindrance into actually achieving something constructive. These kinds of mass-movements and encyclopedic websites are mainly put out there for lazy people who don’t want to research for themselves and who are practically looking for a custom-made lifestyle and belief system to tap into. Especially the more narcissistic personalities tend to be attracted to the Skeptic side; individuals whose main reason for even being on the digital ‘battle-field’ is being able to ridicule and degrade other people, anonymously and without repercussions. At least for now, because for many of them their internet-history will come back to haunt them as soon as the Dominant Minority decides the time is right. There are in fact quite some ‘academic’ books available that are especially written to refute conspiratorial claims. These often go into psychology and sociology in order to standardize and generalize all dissenting opinions and shoehorn as many as possible together, because, well, that’s how counter-intelligence works. [4]  In time I will deal with the many flaws and gross over-rationalizations in the [semi]academic works, but because their arguments are often more specific they also need a more time-consuming refutation. So this will probably be divvied up in several future articles. For this article I only focus on the New World Order-entry on RationalWiki.[5]  I’ve cut up the text of the article into some smaller manageable parts and I counter them one by one. To make clear which quotes are from them I’ve added their orange triangular all-seeing eye image for reference.

Boredom_rationalwikieyeOrigin of the phrase One of the earliest standalone uses of the phrase “New World Order” was the title of the 1920 book The New World Order by Frederick C Hicks, but is usually misattributed to H.G. Wells’ 1940 book of the same name. The phrase had previously been used by Nicholas Murray Butler in his 1917 book A World in Ferment. “New World Order” was also used in a 1940 essay by occultist writer Alice Bailey which was included in her posthumously published 1957 compilation The Externalisation of the Hierarchy. To Hicks, Wells, and Bailey, the term meant a benevolent social democracy that would soon emerge, whilst Butler used the term to describe the First World War as it was being waged. Conspiracy theorists, however, believe the term goes back earlier: to Cecil Rhodes and Lionel Curtis circa 1909.

Unfortunately the Skeptoids derail immediately here, because almost everything in this little text is false. First, by mentioning only a hand-full of names that openly used this phrase makes it seem that it wasn’t a big issue in the first decades of the 20th Century. That’s not completely true, as we shall see. There were in fact many high-placed people and even regular journalists using it, though not always in public documents. Because the New World Order phrase is the central topic on this website I have taken considerable effort to convey its real and complete meaning.  After reading all articles on this website you certainly understand that the description in the RationalWiki article is too simplistic and in fact quite silly. There is much more to it.

I’m personally not familiar with Frederick Hicks, so I skip him for now. Chances are not very great that he’s very important in the big picture anyway. On Nicholas Murray Butler the RationalWiki article is incomplete and dishonest. Butler was for instance a very high and influential initiate in multiple secret societies and was on par with Roosevelt or even Lord Astor. He helped laying the foundations of what later was to become the American Intelligence Community,[6] you know, that center of “benevolent democracy”. In 1925 Butler took over the presidency of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace from Elihu Root and besides that he was one of the guiding lights behind the infamous Committee on Technocracy, which was an outgrowth of the radical Technocrat movement behind the ‘theorist of the leisure class’, Thorstein Veblen. Through a profound collaboration with the New York Times and other leading newspapers this committee actually succeeded in the year 1932 to push the word ‘technocrat’ into the mainstream American discourse. But its real legacy is that it helped laying the foundation of what Aldous Huxley and Bertrand Russell would later call the scientific dictatorship.[7] And the thorough research of the Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics [ISGP] learns us that Butler taught his students that totalitarian regimes were preferable over democratic.[8] It’s puzzling how the boys at RationalWiki can claim that Butler only meant WWI with his ‘new world order’ phrase, given the fact that this man was one of the major internationalists of his time, with other books on his name like The United States Of Europe and The International Mind.

Regarding the long-term agenda of the NWO both Alice Bailey and H.G. Wells were even more important public individuals than Butler. Both can’t be sufficiently dealt with in the short space of this article alone. The kiddos who wrote the RationalWiki pamphlet are particularly on H.G. Wells flat out dishonest, or, more likely, totally oblivious. Wells was of course one of the most vocal advocates for a world government in his time, as you can read for instance in his famous 1915 essay Civilization At The Breaking Point [9] in the New York Times, of which a small clipping is added here.Boredom_wellsNYT In this essay Wells gave mankind only one choice; total destruction and oblivion through perpetual war, or, of course, a World State, which meant world government.[10] For public consumption they always portray their plans as being a benevolent social democracy, but in reality they mean something slightly different. And you only have to read their [lesser known] books to find out. Many historians are initiates of secret societies too, or get paid large sums of money from the people they write about. If a historian receives millions for writing a book, you know something smells fishy. What the official history books don’t mention about certain people or families is often more important than what they do mention. Always go for the books written by the main perpetrators themselves or the people who marry into higher elite families. Books about them by regular authors are often consciously dishonest or incomplete. Wells said on multiple occasions that his favorite literary work was Plato’s The Republic, please keep that in mind. This explains also why Wells was so keen on eugenics. No, not because it was trendy in that era, but because it’s an intrinsic part of the NWO agenda and the Fabian strategy. And it has been creeping back into our society for a few decades now and it will be used again on a scale and ruthlessness unknown in history.

I shall lift a veil on Wells’ real legacy through a few quotes from his book Phoenix: A Summary Of The Inescapable Conditions Of World Reorganization, published two years after his book New World Order.  It can be seen as a kind of successor, but one that seemingly was meant for individuals with positions of influence and power. They have managed to keep this book quite well below the radar all those years, as with some other of his non-fictional works. [11]  For people who understand the esoteric significance of the Phoenix-bird it’s not difficult to make an educated guess that this book might contain some important information. Only a few pages into the book will make it immediately clear why they kept it below the radar. Wells wrote copiously about the disadvantages of the democratic system as it existed in the ‘30s and ‘40s, and after calling a democratic world order established through a “World General Election” a “nightmare”, he let the cat out of the bag:

Obviously the New World Order cannot carry on with these old-fashioned Boredom_wellsdustbin2expedients. And already in our world to-day we have the plain intimations of methods that will consign the rule of the elected persons to the dustbins of history. As big business systems grow, even under the incubus of private ownership, the methods of working approximate more and more clearly to the forms, the ministries and administrations of a world-wide socialist order. [12]

 

In this small but noteworthy book Wells was quite candidly on the long-term agenda of the movement for Worldwide Revolution of which he was a prominent member and propagandist for so long. And that is what the New World Order with capital letters stands for, at least in his writings. He explained in detail how the Bolshevik system would be upgraded, only to be implemented world-wide. This would lead to the inevitable disappearance of national borders, the incremental dissolution of governmental powers and the piecemeal merger with the capitalist system. And this would all happen without causing any major problems with Big Business at all. The business leaders would even be welcomed to participate in their secret order, which they would accept in large numbers. Yes, Wells was in 1942 already laying the foundations for the synthesis of both systems that in reality started behind the scenes directly after the war. In 1920 Wells had already written in his book Russia In The Shadows  that “Big business is by no means antipathetic to Communism. The larger big business grows the more it approximates to Collectivism. It is the upper road of the few instead of the lower road of the masses to Collectivism”. [13]  And along the way the specter of nationalism and national sovereignty had to be eroded and in the end completely destroyed. One other influential writer that agreed with Wells was Arnold J. Toynbee, who wrote this in 1933:

The local national state, invested with the attributes of sovereignty—invested, that is, with the prestige and the prerogatives of the mediaeval Church—is an abomination of desolation standing in the place where it ought not. […] Our political task in our generation is to cast the abomination out, to cleanse the temple and to restore the worship of the divinity to whom the temple rightfully belongs. In plain terms, we have to re-transfer the prestige and the prerogative of sovereignty from the fifty or sixty fragments of contemporary society to the whole of contemporary society–from the local national states by which sovereignty has been usurped, with disastrous consequences, for half a millennium, to some institution embodying our society as a whole. […] I will not prophesy. I will merely repeat that we are at present working, discreetly but with all our might to wrest this mysterious political force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time are denying with our lips what we doing with our hands […] Nevertheless, I believe that the monster is doomed to perish by our sword. The fifty or sixty local states of the world will no doubt survive as administrative conveniences. But sooner or later sovereignty will depart from them. [14]

So what becomes clear from this is that we’re facing an “Open Conspiracy for a World Revolution”, with “minds immeasurably superior to ours”, who “slowly but surely drew their plans against us”, as Wells preached in War Of The Worlds. It’s the Fabian way; an all-encompassing total war of attrition against humanity, wearing us down on all fronts until we as the Western people indeed collapse due to our own materialism, xenophobia, fear and debt. [15]

 

Boredom_rationalwikieyeMeaning for conspiracy theorists
The New World Order conspiracy started as an extension of old John Birch Society conspiracy theories about the role of the United Nations. This theory claimed that the United Nations was merely a tool of the Communists, and that the end goal was the complete subjugation of the United States to the United Nations. This would then set up a world government in which all of the freedoms that Americans hold dear would be abolished.

This vision on the UN is only partially right. It is a project of the Dominant Minority, who gave us both capitalism and communism and who give us the synthesis too. These systems are mere tools giving us dogmas to believe in so we pick a side and stop thinking for ourselves. But in reality they control everything from behind the scenes. Wells elaborated on this in his book Phoenix:

The existing governments will not have to surrender to anybody or anything. They can continue. They will not give up something; they will add something to the world. The legal form in which the new world order will arise will be as a system of federally cooperative world authorities with powers delegated to them by the existing governments. The governments can go on existing, giving their consent and benediction to the new administrations they have authorized.

The World Revolutionary movement will watch and sustain the process, making more and more people realize what has happened. There will never be a World State, as we apprehend a State. As the new methods get into working order the national governments will vanish, softly and unobtrusively, from the lay-out of the world. This final dissolving away of the State was foretold very definitely by Lenin. […] In this book we have assembled the whole complete case for rational World Reconstruction. Every part of it interlocks and depends upon every other part. Take it or leave it. There is no other way. [16]

Yes, there is no other way. There can be only One; Neo, één, ein; uno; un. Wells’ vision was of course completely in line with what has happened since and is still happening around the world today. Alice Bailey too favored exactly the same, only she spun the World Revolutionary movement into the mysterious ‘Hidden Masters’, who also, “across the gulf of space, regard this Earth with envious eyes”. Wells and his fellow-Fabians saw themselves as the Gods of War, metaphorically operating from Mars. Their old logo was a wolf in sheep’s clothing and they named themselves ‘Fabian’ after the famous Roman emperor Fabius Maximus. It’s certainly no coincidence that in Roman mythology the wolf was ‘the animal of Mars’. Furthermore, it seems that at “the Battle of Sentinum in 295 BC, the appearance of the wolf of Mars (Martius lupus) was a sign that Roman victory was to come.” [17]   In Wells’ time Harold MacMillan was even propagating that the British acted exactly the same on the Americans as the Greeks did on the Romans in their time; as their intellectually superior puppeteers. This can be seen as partially true, but for the Brits it was reality. The Freemasonic writer Tobias Churton neatly described how ‘Renaissance Men’ like H.G. Wells behave in times of war:

“He takes the seat of Mars, and he fights–while, beneath the breastplate and the plume, he thinks, he studies, he observes, he seeks.” [18]

To paraphrase War Of The Worlds  again: “the chances of anything coming from Mars, are a million to one…but still…they…come!” For every one of them there are a million of us indeed, don’t forget that! You can find the title song of the music opera version of Wells’ book by Jeff Wayne in MUSIC MAESTRO.  But Wells, the “friendly benevolent social democrat” as some want us to believe, had also something to say on the millions of opponents their movement would encounter. Because

even when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people, from maharajas to millionaires and from pukkha sahibs to pretty ladies, will hate the new world order, be rendered unhappy by frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent and will die protesting against it. [19]

Wells even hinted us in his book The Shape Of Things To Come  that the third world war would be mainly fought in the Middle-East and would spread from there. And countless people have been dying, haven’t they? The maharaja’s in the East were the first to suffer severely, and more recently we have seen millionaire bankers jumping off roofs by the troves. Millionaires are also middle class from the viewpoint of the 0,1%, hence superfluous too. But since pukkha sahibs in Wells’ time was British slang for Europeans [20]  it looks like the European population, both male and female, might be next. There are of course many possible scenarios for the coming decade, but this is beyond the scope of this article. For Skeptoids who think that this last Wells quote was an exception we return briefly to his book Phoenix. He made perfectly clear that people adhering to the world religions, but especially the Christian church, would be among their biggest enemies. They would first engage in thorough preparatory work, but

when all this much has been arranged for, there still remains a residuum of implacable enemies with whom no course is possible but killing. Killing is really a far more civilized treatment of a criminal than effectively preventive imprisonment, which, like flogging, demoralizes flogger and jailer as much or more than the man it punishes. [21]

Yes, he loved us. Now follow a few other additional examples of the NWO phrase in early 20th Century media or literature. This will make clear that this phrase was quite commonly used even at that time. We first go to one of the close confidants of Teddy Roosevelt, named Frederick Lynch. Boredom_lynchHe used the phrase in the more private sphere of the books they wrote for each other, but also in multiple newspaper articles. On the right you can see a small clipping of an article that was written about Frederick Lynch in the Brooklyn Daily Eagle  newspaper in April 1919.[22] We learn that Lynch had just returned from Europe and was on his way to inform the New York liberal elite on the new role America would play in the New World Order. Note the capital letters, which might indicate that they were referring to their own esoteric meaning of the term, as explained in my articles that I linked to earlier. We see that as usual the information in the newspapers is very slim, mostly only touching trivia.

We now turn to one of Lynch’ books that he wrote for his elitist circle, to see the difference. The book is called Personal Recollections Of Andrew Carnegie, and herein Lynch lifts a veil on how deep the longing for unification of the world really goes within the higher elites. Andrew Carnegie, who was a high initiate in the mystery schools, [23] was described by Lynch like this:

He was always on the lookout for young men to whom he could pass on his work and interests. This was one of the secrets of his great business success. He watched with great keenness the young men in his employ, and as he found the right man he turned over responsibilities to him. He thus discovered thirty or forty of the men who afterwards became heads of his great industries and succeeded to them. In the same way he was always watching for young men who had come under the spell of the vision of a new world order based on those same principles which prevail among gentlemen. He believed that nations could live together as gentlemen as easily as individuals. He believed that nations could outgrow dueling as had individuals. He did not believe that the question of justice could be settled by fists or guns. He believed the time had come, when, if this was called to the attention of most men, and arbitration treaties, international courts, leagues of peace-loving nations offered in the place of war as a method of settling international disputes, they would rise to them. This was his chief Interest. He was possessed by it; when he found anyone equally enthusiastic, especially a young man, he at once became interested In him. [24]

So it seems ol’ man Carnegie wasn’t just hoping for a righteous New World Order for us all, no, he was possessed by it! I suggest reading my article OLD MAN OF THE MOUNTAIN to compare their mindsets. This is queer elitism, something we can’t really relate to. But we have to try in order to understand the Order. We must ask ourselves some questions here. What could be the reason that when it comes to uniting humanity so many of the big players act like Golem longing for the Ring or like a child crying for their Mother? Why do people like Carnegie, who largely built their wealth on the waging of war actually want world peace? And why are members of the Dominant Minority so often referring to themselves as being possessed or guided by some higher intelligence? Even in our time they’re still thinking they’re doing God’s work. But which God do they mean by that?

Of course, there is no such thing as possession or higher intelligence, we’ve learned that reading RationalWiki, haven’t we? I personally really don’t know. We as ‘regular’  people have never and probably will never experience something as direct contact with entities, spirits or whatever. But isn’t this probably due to the fact that we simply never search for it? It seems that some higher initiates into the Mysteries really think they are possessed or that they have the powers of invocation. Can this be because they do actually seek for it? How can you know something doesn’t exist if you have never sought for it? Alice Bailey, that other “benevolent social democrat”, was according to her husband Foster Bailey “perfectly possessed” for the better part of her life. Why do such people reach high positions in powerful institutions like the UN? That’s something to be skeptical about I’d say. And which one really is the scariest scenario; those people really being possessed, or it all being a big joke, with the public don’t giving a damn about it? But this is really how you can recognize an ‘Illuminatus’; by the undying zeal to unite the world and everything on it; by doing God’s work in order to become gods themselves. This is what many high initiates of all Ages have had in common, no matter if they were statesmen, kings, philosophers or scientists. Ponder on this for a while, because it’s a very important step into understanding why this theme of incessant forced unification has been re-emerging again and again throughout history, wreaking so much havoc amongst civilizations, almost always for the glory and enlightenment of only a few. For more information on this puzzling issue, see OUR DEMON-HAUNTED ELITE. But for now; back to World Order.

During the Interbellum the League of Nations was Boredom_lloydgeorgein effect, but as we know it wasn’t able to live up to its promises. Woodrow Wilson’s administration failed getting the US in, which in hindsight can be seen as one of the major misfortunes in the plans for world unity. Again a newspaper clipping is added, this one from the New York Times of September 1922. [25]  They quoted then Prime-Minister Lloyd George as saying that the League was indeed a steppingstone to the world government they all so vividly craved for. The phrase ‘Parliament of Man’ originates from the famous poem Locksley Hall by the Freemason Alfred Tennyson. [26]

During the years of the Second World War the ‘new world order’ phrase came back with a vengeance in the news and also among many public speakers. You can find many examples of this in my articles that I linked to at the start of this essay. But we go now to the period right after the war, when the Soviet Union magically changed from friend to foe and the atomic scare became headlines. In The Rivals; America And Russia Since World War II  the American historian Adam B. Ulam wrote about the catchphrase that found its way through the scientific community to the public: “one world or none”, which meant that due to the dangers of atomic warfare time was running out for all of humanity. He cited a scholar who wrote that this imminent peril was so immense that it had good probability to help increase acceptance of the United Nations and its Charter among the people, so that they would finally accept world government. Ulam added that all the

old complaints against the U.N. Charter’s preservation of the veto power, hence of the obsolete notion of state sovereignty, were revived to nourish a myriad of new plans for world government. […] The Baruch plan was a carefully prepared official document, not an agonized plea for mankind to repent and set up a world government. But the international authority it proposed was bound to become a sort of superstate. [27]

So again we see the recurring theme of a choice between some kind of world governmental body or total oblivion, followed up by a secretive plan that in the end turns out different than initially promised.

 

The first highprofile use of “New World Order” by a politician was in a speech given by George H. W. Bush after the Cold War ended. In that speech, Bush was explaining that, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the United States and Russia would cooperate, rather than compete.

 

We already know now that the above claim is quite superficial, but let me explain how incomplete it really is. I’ve added a clipping from a New York Sun article [28]  from July 1919 in which Senator Lebaron B. Colt of Rhode Island conveyed a similar message as President George H.W. Bush told the world in his famous ‘new world order speech’ on September 11th, 1990.Boredom_LON We’re going to compare the two, because the more the elites call for change, the more really stays the same. Mister Colt was the nephew of the infamous Samuel Colt, the big-shot arms manufacturer.[29] So here we see another example of a perpetrator pretending to be our savior! Is it really plausible that people like this are really on some kind of benevolent holy quest to abolish war on the planet? In his own way mister Colt sought to convince the American people of the fact that the United States had to engage in ‘pre-emptive wars’. He tried to push it through by advocating the “enforcement of the terms of peace”, because, well, the bad guys just don’t want to accept peace, don’t they? They really hate freedom, they really hate peace. They all really hate our enlightened Western civilization of scared and narcissistic automatons who are slowly decaying in front of their television screens. The “great undertaking” [being high-Masonic undertakers] got polished up by the Bush administration into the “Big Idea”. Colt lamented that the rule of law had been replaced for one of force. But luckily for us President Bush was able to tell the world that the pendulum was swinging back and that they will substitute the law of the jungle, full of mesmerized little monkeys, for the Rule of Law. And we will know their name is the Law! Let’s now examine the relevant part of the famous Bush speech in detail:

 This is an historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold war. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order — a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful — and we will be — we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders. [30]

While almost everybody focuses on the ‘new world order’ part in the speech, this is not the important part. I have highlighted the parts that I think are much more important. In order to retrace the exact wording of the original UN Charter, I took my copy of the book The Parliament Of Man: The United Nations And The Quest For World Government  by Paul Kennedy from my bookshelf. Yes, could knock me down with a feather too, but the book really says: World…Government. Let’s hope the RationalWiki raiders don’t find out about poor mister Kennedy, because they might try to debunk or harass him. I wonder if he’s ever been accused of ‘crank magnetism’ before? [31]  In the appendix of the book the complete original version of the UN Charter is printed. I would recommend everyone to read the Charter for yourselves completely, so you can see that the wording is perfectly in line with, well, most speeches that have been made by all political leaders from all member-states for all those years. We find for instance the phrase “great progress” from the Bush speech also back in the Charter. “The promise and vision of the U.N.’s Founders” was of course world government, just as the founders of the League of Nations envisaged before them. Which isn’t that strange, because the same Dominant Minority was behind both experiments. But unfortunately the concept of global government got ‘stained’ through many years of staunch opposition, so as time progressed they changed it a little tiny bit to ‘world governance’ and hope by using this instead people won’t notice. And probably they’re right. According to Paul Kennedy the UN Charter “reads rather like the statutes for membership in a London or a New York gentleman’s club.”[32] [in other words: a Masonic club.] President Bush also gave us the phrase “conduct of nations”. Just to be completely sure, let’s ask Oxford dictionary what they could mean with ‘conduct’:

– The manner in which a person behaves, especially in a particular place or situation.
– The manner in which an organization or activity is managed or directed
– Lead or guide (someone) to or around a particular place  [33]

The funny thing is actually that they have been working for a long time now on the gradual dissolving of nation-states, so in the end only the people will remain to be “conducted”. If they’re successful, and they will bee, they will forge their new order of things within the lifetime of most of the people reading this. The fall of communism was only a show for the public; what Bush really meant with “we have in this past year made great progress” was that they had succeeded in starting the last phase of the synthesis between communism and capitalism into the ‘higher’ new form of civilization; one step closer to unity; one step closer to godhood. There already have introduced all kinds of nifty new names for it, like sustainable socialism, hyper-connected smart city-states, participatory democracy, diminutive democracy, green governance, etc. Different names with slightly different outcomes, but all based on the main tenets of collectivism, digitalization and the disappearance of individual privacy, individual freedom and in the end individuality altogether.

Paul Kennedy also wrote about the “high-minded” language of the UN Charter and subsequent documents. He explained that “officials inside and writers on the outside were describing the new world organization as a sort of three-legged stool”. The first leg signified the obtainment of international security through diplomacy and military, the second instruments to build the structural economic and infrastructural body, and the third

was arguably the most interesting of all and clearly picked up the idealist legacies of Kant, Wilson, and others. It argued that however strongly the first two legs were constructed, the system would fold – would collapse – if it did not produce ways of improving better political and cultural understandings among peoples. Since war begins in the minds of men, it was (and is) in that realm that important advances were required.” [34]

Can you hear me in there, or not yet? The real translation of this trinity they have concocted for us would then be Mind [Leg 1], Body [Leg 2] and Spirit [Leg 3], the three hermetic principles to become ‘thrice greatest’. It probably won’t surprise you that the tree-legged stool is a Masonic concept. [35]  Kennedy therefore didn’t forget to add that to “forge” a document as important as this Charter, “great craftsmen” were necessary. And we can be sure that all individuals who helped during the long and difficult forging process of the document were in fact high initiates. If “that realm” of yours is still working properly, you already understand what they’re hinting about all the time. But if you’re still guessing I suggest reading for instance the books The People Shapers  by Vance Packard, Physical Control Of The Mind  by José M. Delgado, Earth Rising  by Nick Begich, Brainwashing  by Kathleen Taylor, or Battle For The Mind  by William Sargant. Preferably all.

Sir Julian Huxley was the first Director of UNESCO. He hoped he would be remembered for his great and synthesizing visions on science: “By working together, we must lay a conscious basis for a new world order, the next step in our human evolution”. [36]  So for him the NWO even meant the next step in evolution, which seems to be something more than just a redefined balance of power, doesn’t it?  To help achieving the long stated goal, Huxley coined the term Transhumanism. Oh, and as we can read in his autobiography, he thought he was possessed too. But does that really still surprise you?

Boredom_unesco

Another iconic phrase George H.W. Bush gave to the world and which gets often connected to his new world order remarks, is his vision of the ‘Thousands Points of Light’. He did this in his 1989 inaugural address and it therefore has no direct connection with the speech we talked about above. It might not surprise you that this phrase hasn’t been used that much before in modern times, probably only by C.S. Lewis and H.G. Wells. The latter wrote in Mr. Britling Sees It Through: “Never was the fabric of war so black; that I admit. But never was the black fabric of war so threadbare. At a thousand points the light is shining through.” [37]

Alice Bailey lifted the veil on the esoteric meaning of points of light in her book Externalization Of The Hierarchy:  “The critical situation upon the outer plane is only a reflection of still more critical inner conditions, and you can give acceptable help if you evoke your own will and control your emotions, disciplining your personality. Thus you will be able to present a tiny focal point through which the spiritual Forces can work. Through the agency of the many tiny points of light and will, much potency can be transmitted.”[38] What that means becomes clear from this passage from her book Esoteric Psychology II,  in which she tells us that the

success of the present endeavor is contingent upon the availability of the forces which stand for progressive righteousness and the ability of the disciples of the world to act in unison, and so to influence public opinion that there can be a worldwide change in human attitudes, but the members of the New Group of World Servers must refrain from dissipating their efforts in secondary activities.  For these latter, there will be time, once the main objective has been reached.  The immediate objectives of the Plan might be stated as follows:

  1. To raise the level of the human consciousness so that intelligent thinking men and women will be consciously in touch with the world of ideas and the realm of intuitive perception.  This means that they will be oriented towards reality. This is no picture of an immediate Utopia.  The modification of the present situation, even in a small measure, is a Herculean task, and will strain the resources of the New Group of World Servers to the utmost.
  2. The second objective of Those who are working out the Plan is the clarifying of the international situation. […] Practically all world problems and differences are based upon an economic situation.  It is, therefore, more important in the solution of the present world problem than are the political rivalries and the selfish, individual, national ambitions. The providing of adequate food, raiment and housing facilities to the unthinking masses everywhere will bring about a changed world psychology, which will be constructive and sound, and which will usher in the deeply desired era of peace and plenty.
  3. The third objective is the growth of the group idea with a consequent general emphasis upon group good, group understanding, group inter-relation, and group good will.  These four are the ideals of that subjective group, working on the physical plane, which we call the New Group of World Servers.

If these ideals can be materialized, this new group provides a nucleus for that future world group which will gradually knit together all men in the cause of true brotherhood. [39]

We now return to the RationalWiki article, which seemingly got stuck somewhere in the ‘70s:

Boredom_rationalwikieyeIts popularization among conspiracy theorists can be traced to over thirty years ago when “New World Order” appeared in the 1972 book None Dare Call It Conspiracy by Gary Allen, a John Birch Society writer. Allen claimed it to be the “code word” which the International Communist ConspiracyTM would use when they were ready to unveil their secret plans for a socialist world government. This book was widely read in right-wing conspiracy-minded circles during the 1970s and is probably the source of the hysteria that later erupted over the term.

I myself am not from the US, so it’s hard for me to tell how big the impact of that Gary Allen book once was. If you have managed to read this far into this article, you already know that the above claims are rationally unsound; let’s call them false. Persevere and you’ll find much more proof of this.

It seems that during the Second World War there Boredom_overtonwas some little NWO-“hysteria” too amongst the American people, as you can read in the added clipping from the Rogersville Review  from Tennessee, June 22, 1944. [40]  We learn practically everybody was talking about the world order to come! From high up in the “professional” circles, until way way way down to the politicians and lawyers drifters, street-sweepers, shoe-shiners, vagabonds. Pretty sure among these people were some crazy conspiranoids too! And of course this article underlines once again that the NWO phrase has always been connected with “the framing of machinery of world government”. Claiming otherwise sends you directly to the loony bin.

It’s important to understand that the Dominant Minority who gave us the phrase ‘New World Order’ have also given us both Capitalism and Communism. Communism was crafted, steered and financed by the banking elite, as Anthony C. Sutton and others have proven in detail. At the very top there is no division, certainly not political. The New Age movement emerged in ‘60s, but was already at least 80 years in a constructive stage, mainly through Theosophy, Hinduism from India through the British East-India company, and a large amount of small Christian sects. It ALL stems from the same relatively small group, including Darwinism and humanism. I suggest reading the book by James H. Billington – Fire In The Minds Of Men – which meticulously details how Socialism and Communism grew out of the secret doctrines of the Mystery Schools, with even the infamous Bavarian Illuminati among them. That is probably Weishaupt’s only important long-lasting legacy, that his group helped sowing the seeds of revolution across Europe. [41]   His movement was just a small subversive group among many that worked through secret societies, and most of what’s propagated about the Bavarian Illuminati is fiction or wildly exaggerated and mainly meant for what they call the ‘externalization of the hierarchy’. History tells us that in the final stage of an empire or of an Age, in many cases superstition and supernatural fiction have been introduced. This because this aids in the controlled destruction of the empire and the realm it governs. It gives people escapism while they’re slowly taken down. “Panem et Circenses”, as it was called in the Roman Empire.

Another way to take down a civilization is byBoredom_overtonReal feeding them drugs, this is where the New Age movement comes back in. One of the forerunners of the New Age movement in America was the New Era Church. I’ve added an interesting newspaper clipping from one reverend Daniel Overton from March 1919. [42]

And so we learn that the ‘new world order’ phrase was imbedded already into at least some religious cults too. According to the reverend the United States had to share its wealth and power with the world, whilst forcefully making it safe for democracy. The army had to persevere until all the bad guys in the world would be disciplined with democracy. Grab the savages, put a pencil and voting ticket in their hand and tell them to shut up and vote. That’s freedom, you stupid! In our present time we are in the closing phase of this globalized Manifest Destiny, with only two or three countries left to bomb into accepting democracy. This is what a century of longing for a new world order has brought the world: a quest for world peace through rivers of innocent blood. It was meant that way. One Charles Keller, a present-day devotee of H.G. Wells, explains this rather nicely:

Devoted readers of H.G. Wells are used to him destroying the world in one way or another in some of his fiction. However, Wellsians around the world were especially horrified by the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, and the total destruction in New York of the World Trade Center. For us the scenario seemed all too familiar. A similar event had already been described by Wells in his 1908 novel The War in the Air in which the destruction of New York was wrought by Prussian airships in a pre-emptive strike against America at the outset of a devastating world war. Of course the destruction of the world often imagined by H.G. Wells never happened without reason. For him the fictional destruction of civilization was meant as the means to an end. It gave mankind pause to reflect on his failed stewardship of his fellow men and home planet, and provided a precious opportunity to re-organize a new world sanely and equitably. [43]

As we know, fiction and non-fiction were often woven together brilliantly by Wells, partly as predictive programming and probably partly for fun too. Because you can say much about the conspirators, but not that they never add some very obvious humoristic clues into their works. Sadly most of them go by unnoticed by most people. But the Wellsians agree too that one should never get a good crisis go to waste, because we all know that it gives the opportunity to change things in society that would otherwise take many decades. In the aforementioned book Phoenix, Wells wrote that he and his publisher Secker & Warburg came to the conclusion that every reader of this book would be able to get something out of it, because it was solely meant to arouse action. Preferably the readers would start spreading the word, for instance through a “discussion circle of any sort”. Then Wells got a bit more specific on the intended reader: “He may become a casualty or he may become part of the Open Conspiracy. Then whatever else he does he will continue to serve the propaganda, quietly or urgently as his gifts and opportunities determine.” [44]  Yes, you’re with us, or you’re with the terrorists. That’s their meme.  Is always has been.

 

The most popular variation used to maintain that international bankers (a common code word for the Jews) were pulling the strings in both the US and the USSR. Others of a more obvious racist bent flat-out said that Zionists were the ones responsible (Like always). As many conspiracy theorists also believe that the Jews are responsible for either the banks or Communism (or both), these three strands are often woven together into a completely ridiculous whole.

People who claim that almost everybody in the anti-globalist movement blames the Jews has never really studied the literature and the individuals therein. Only a small minority can be called racists or anti-Semites, but unfortunately this minority is vocal and the mass-media and Skeptics terribly eager to listen. It’s one of the oldest tricks in the book to hype up mass xenophobia and latent racism by paying a few individuals to incite racial hatred in public view. And then it’s easy to paint whole movements with this brush only through the use of some simple buzzwords. See the article WISE TO IGNORE for a rebuttal of arguments used by racists and anti-Semites, and for an ongoing investigation on the racist insurgents into the anti-globalist movement. Even our language is used as a weapon against us, because by the constant flow of new polarizing terms and radical neologisms, which mainly originate from think-tanks and NGO’s, intelligent in-depth discussion becomes more and more nonexistent. Together with the infantilizing effect social media has on people we’re well on our way to an irreversible form of linguistic minimalism. Nowadays for every line of thinking or reasoning words are introduced that have been especially concocted to attack and nullify. Therefore all discussions get stuck immediately and the person shouting the buzzword wins on some silly basis of moral high-ground. And this has led to an explosion of shallow websites and blogs, which in some cases are able to disgrace many decades of research of individuals or groups with only a few lines of rubbish filled with stupid buzzwords like “crank”, “conspiracy theorist” or “tinfoil hat”, or whatever bullshit buzzword is fashionable at the time.

As everybody with his mind right knows, not all bankers are Jewish and neither are the ‘Open Conspirators’. Even if all of the conspirators hypothetically were Jewish, it wouldn’t be a Jewish conspiracy, because this can only be if all Jews in the world would be in on it and consciously working towards it. There are of course people crazy enough to think such a thing, but with such people it’s probably too late to argue anyway.

Every human being is basically equal, with the same hopes and fears and similar wants and needs. Some may be more intelligent or blessed with larger appliances, but all the differences that we fight about are purposely created for us, and propagated with our own mutual consent. Zionism is also one of those extremely abused phrases that immediately push all people in conversation in a pre-prepared corner. Just as with all movements, the leaders are the ones who divide the rest, and they are the ones that have urges for world domination. As you can see in the clipping here added on the right, David Wolfsohn was apparently one of them. [45]

But, to give an example of the opposite, we below can read how the Jewish-American senator James A. Reed timely understood what the League of Nations really was or would become; a wolf in sheep’s clothing. [This once again underlines that you always must judge every individual on their own merits. Never hate a group, ethnicity or race, because with it you fall in the oldest trap set out for us.] In a 1920 newspaper article senator Reed looked back on the issue:

“On one other alleged war measure I was found in opposition. It was demanded that the president was given authority to create a press censorship. That proposition I helped to kill. The freedom of the press is essential to the liberties of the people. Presented as a panacea for human ills and a sure cure for war, the League of Nations was at first accepted by the American people. Their minds had been prepared by a great and costly propaganda. But the debated began to disclose one ugly fact after another. Among these, that a super-world Government was to be created.” [46]

Few have said it better I think. Again and again the globalists have succeeded in convincing the people that they must collectively build some kind of benevolent Utopia, with probably the majority of the lower circles of leaders actually believing this being the end-goal. If we’d just fight one more war for them. One more, and it will all be over. All off a sudden the whole world will transform into one happy playground where everybody loves each other and perpetually lives in peace. And this all through the magic of Democracy, of which poetry will be written and hymns will be sung. And so we yell “yes we can” once again, and get fooled like we deserve. This is a level of foolishness that even people in the Dark Ages would laugh about.

 

Boredom_rationalwikieyeSupporters of this theory can say to a certain degree who is part of it but nobody can determine who isn’t part of the NWO. International organizations such as the World Bank, IMF, European Union, the United Nations, and NATO are often listed as core NWO organizations. Presidents and prime ministers of nations are routinely included in the conspiracy. […] The most striking difference between reality and the Conspiracy Theory is the CT’s idea that everyone with power is in strict collaboration. In actuality, there is much competition, backstabbing, and differing goals between Presidents, military leaders, business managers, and others in power.

Yes, of course there is also much in-fighting within politics and other power centers, mostly among the lower ranks. If every leader and powerful individual was completely malleable the agenda would have been fulfilled long ago. But much of back-stabbing and fighting is only show for the public. On the issue of who’s in and who’s not in I shall give a more detailed explanation, because this is an important but also very difficult subject. It’s one of the major hindrances of all alternative movements and researchers, and one of the weaker points in the theories. But on the other hand it isn’t really strange either that it’s not easy to research and fully understand the plans of people that want to keep secrets from everybody else? On the one hand they go to great lengths to hide things from the masses, but on the other hand also very much gets published. A researcher into this material often has to rely on hunches, follow shaky leads and avoid the big piles of disinformation that are put on his way. But all investigative ‘journalism’ works this way. But in this field there is the complicating factor of the secret societies and esoteric doctrines too. It’s hard to investigate something as the subjects themselves are bent on keeping most its whereabouts, machinations and information secret. And sometimes they are also putting out large volumes of disinformation to muddy up the field even more. And with secret societies that are really sophisticated we probably don’t even know their names, or their very existence! But that doesn’t mean they aren’t there or have to be discarded. You can train yourself into seeing the hidden manipulation on society as soon as you start to understand more on the Great Work and where it wants to go. You can think about things that might have to be introduced and as soon as this happens you know you have a lead. Let’s take as an example the very influential Round Table Group by Lord Alfred Milner. Professor Carroll Quigley wrote extensively about it in his great book The Anglo-American Establishment.  In it he noted a whole list of milestones the Group achieved in a rather short time, of which the founding of the Royal Institute for International Affairs was one of the most important. It has since been one of the primary NGO’s in the world. [47]  On the Roundtable Group Quigley elaborated that it

would be expected that a Group which could number among its achievements such accomplishments as these would be a familiar subject for discussion among students of history and public affairs. In this case, the expectation is not realized. […] This Group, held together, as it is, by the tenuous links of friendship, personal association, and common ideals is so indefinite in its outlines that it is not always possible to say who is a member and who is not. Indeed, there is no sharp line of demarcation between those who are members and those who are not, since “membership” is possessed in varying degrees, and the degree changes at different times.[48]

So here we see that even an insider as Quigley had very much trouble into understanding the structure of the Group, notwithstanding even documenting what they were all about. So for ‘regular’ people it’s nearly impossible to do so. But that doesn’t make it less important? Looking the other way doesn’t make a problem disappear. So it’s not the case that the Dominant Minority pokers with an open hand, but most of the time enough of their plans get published to at least understand the contours of their workings. But because it’s so terribly intricate and spans almost all scientific and social fields out there, it often is simply too big for one person to comprehend. A big part of the information which is not directly available for the regular public is shielded off through the regular systems of data-protection, by logins, intranet or a pay-wall. And this is combined with a highly compartmentalized differential structure where most branches only have access to their part of the whole. But much relevant information is in fact traceable and available through the internet, although that takes knowledge and a lot of work and time. More and more documentation becomes freely available on the internet, like the old newspapers as the ones I have use on this website. Many activists upload material that they can share with each other. This way we can build our own information libraries. To counter this they have come up with the Cloud, which of course will be the nail in the coffin of private digital property for all of us as soon as it’s fully implemented. Because that’s the nature of clouds; as soon as the Sun rises at the dawning of the new day I wouldn’t be surprised if some clouds magically dissolve right before our eyes. So now we have a golden opportunity for all researchers, for as long as it is still possible at least. But to understand the total machinery of society and how it’s used to tighten the control on us consists still of way too much information to comprehend with only a few people. Because the people at the top of the societal pyramid have the money and equipment to access large parts of the important information that humanity puts out, they are able to get the helicopter-view on what really is happening in the world and can act on that. All important NGO’s and think-tanks are owned and funded by only a small group, the same group as I have been talking about. And the thousands of other lesser NGO’s work directly or indirectly for the higher ones. They all have shiny reports and conclusions, but these are only miniscule parts of the full picture. Therefore the incessant centralization and concentration of power, data and information we see everywhere. In our time information is by far the most important weapon to have. It’s the only thing neccesary and the only thing that might give the people a chance.

So to cut it short; the steering of the world society is not easy, but also not impossible. It’s in fact a lot easier than many people think. The main exoteric agenda for the ‘globalists’ is globalization, so therefore all institutions which have especially been founded for accelerating this process can be seen as part of the ‘Agenda.’ But that doesn’t mean that all people who work at such institutions are automatically part of the NWO, of course not. The moment the Dominant Minority succeeded into creating the global atmosphere in which people all over the world started to believe ‘change is good’ and globalization is positive and even inevitable, was a great leap forward for them. Because from then on, people they don’t even know and don’t need to know started helping them with their agenda. And by paying big sums of money to people who come up with new ideas on globalization the process even accelerated further. And much earlier in the Agenda they’ve started up the Intelligence Agencies to protect their overseas assets and to ‘nudge’ nation-states and leaders who were stalling their agenda of forced globalization. These agencies pretend to protect governments and people, but in reality of course mainly stir up peoples around the world in order to keep it all in flux. That is their main part of the Great Work, because without tension and agitation and enough weapons to relieve this there is no change. And change they all believe in. Nowadays they are also more into the perfecting of the electronic prison web around the world. And the fact that they once in a while have to cover their eyes for small terrorist attacks to happen, or orchestrate them themselves in order to further their part of the agenda is only a small sacrifice, and minor to what they have concocted in many parts of the world in the second half of the last century. It’s all worth it, because in the end world peace will be achieved. It all is just means to an end. In time they will be let loose on the Western people, convinced that they really are attacking bad people. The marching orders of the military-industrial complex are to engineer and implement a worldwide electronic prison grid to keep everybody safe. And so there are many more branches; the big activists groups on sustainability who think it’s great to standardize us all, the gender-gap activists who think they are fighting for equality, etc. All stem from the same spider in the web. All! This sounds unbelievable because it is unbelievable, but do you research and you will see. So every group in the total plan does their own little bit, never knowing what the end-goal is, and never caring. Who nowadays even looks ten years ahead? For most people their attention span has shrunken to minutes, or seconds. They are already living in an eternal now.

So with this structure and relatively simple tricks none of the lower people who’re helping with this globalization scheme have to receive any deeper information on what the higher elites might be planning for the moment the world is actually united. This way only the small inner group which can be classed as the real conspiracy needs to have the esoteric knowledge and strict confidentiality. And then you come back into the realm of secret societies and elitist bloodlines, another minefield but on the other hand a key into understanding the intergenerational zeal under wich some of the globalists operate, sometimes working 15 hours a day until the day they die.

So, it’s most practical to see the NWO agenda as a giant corporation, because it really works that way, I think. The article ADAPT AND DIE goes deeper into this. The term conspiracy is therefore not feasible, because it isn’t really a conspiracy as such, only on the highest levels. As mentioned before, H.G. Wells called it an Open Conspiracy, which suffices better. And it works mainly through institutions, foundations and NGO’s. Many individuals built on Wells’ works, like for instance Marilyn Ferguson in her book The Aquarius Conspiracy. She was also very candid about it and explained how they were working with thousands of influential people from all strata all over the world to forge a new order of things. Another great example is the Club of Rome, one of the most influential environmental think-tanks among the ranks of the United Nations. In the book The First Global Revolution they openly wrote working with about a hundred individuals from 53 different countries from all over the world on global problems and solution in order to unite the world. [49]

As you see in the clipping from the book they are also keen on forging, preferably whole societies at once. They want to “mobilize the human energy”, because, well, we are of course nothing more than human resources to them. Their agenda is perfectly in line with the works of Wells and cronies, as we can see in the chapter The Limits Of Democracy.  We there can read that in “its present form, democracy is no longer well-suited for the tasks ahead”, and therefore they think the “crucial need is to revitalize democracy and give it a breadth of perspective that will enable it to cope with the evolving global situation”. In other words; our democracy is in flux. The Club wrote that its main task during the eighties was to find “a common adversary” against whom the people “can organize themselves and act together”. They hinted at the fact that there have been many examples in history before where empires, states and leaders have used the “ploy of finding a scapegoat” to mobilize the masses. This scapegoat could be imaginary or real. They later concluded with this iconic statement:

In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself. [50]

Yes… Humanity! You, me, ev’rybody! Some people accuse the Club of Rome of admitting here to have ‘invented’ global warming, but that is not very convincing. But the authors Schneider and King did hint that such a thing has often been done before in history, which is quite remarkable on itself for a renowned think-tank with very high-placed people amongst its ranks and honorary members. They certainly admit using global warming as one of the catalyzing events that would “fit the bill” for their agenda of forced globalization. But a question for the most ardent skeptics reading this: we here have a group of about a hundred individuals who receive intensive funding, wield great power and who write a book to convince people of their view that mankind is the new enemy of the 21st Century, right? Does this constitute as a conspiracy to you? Because if not, then I really don’t know what does. And that’s even besides the fact if the Club of Rome even really meant what they wrote or are capable of following it up, because this might be the first time in history that somebody actually wrote the whole of humanity down as being the enemy! If you compare this with all well-known tyrants in the 20th Century, they all only had a small part of the world’s population targeted as enemy, so the possible implications of it are enormous, to say the least. Sadly enough it only becomes a shadowy conspiracy due to the fact that even while people are pointing to publications like this, most people simply don’t care and don’t even bother to look into it. They will dismiss it right away, because in their minds it cannot be true because otherwise they would know, wouldn’t they? Someone would have done something about it, it has to be. Most people have become so used to being told by their own authorities who the bad guy of the moment is, that without this daily direction, without someone pointing their finger and saying “that’s the bad guy”, they have no idea what to think about at all. Hence they retreat further and further into mindless escapism, like sports and entertainment.

That’s the most displeasing side of doing this research, I think, because every so often you get your reconfirmation that humanity just seems incapable to learn from the past. And they’re not even trying, that’s the worst part. And there are very many hints and indirect proofs that the elites are playing with the idea of eradicating a big part of the earth’s population. Is there direct proof that some higher elites or some of their closest helpers are actually consciously working for this or stated this before camera? No, I presume not. But that would be one of those examples they do want to keep secret, don’t you think? And furthermore many high-placed studies have already been released that directly or indirectly stated that earth only is sustainable with for instance 1 or 2 billion people. Even the advisers to the Pope have come out with this in 2015. There have also been many lower elites that have stated in books or interviews that they would be happy if some kind of worldwide virus would break out to cull the population. In a live interview this can be a slip of the tongue maybe. [Can it, I don’t know?] But nobody accidentally releases a book with the statement that he can relate himself to the idea of reincarnating as a deadly virus to wreak havoc among mankind, like Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, did. [51]  Besides, do you really need them to make it that clear before coming into action?

I really wonder how many people would even care when some elites would actually state something like this on live television. Imagine during the commercials of the final of the Super Bowl or FIFA World Cup a video-clip is played in which a group of well-known elites unequivocally state that they want to eliminate most of us. Then the video message stops and the match continues. What would happen you think? I presume nothing. People would dismiss it as a joke, cheer along for their favorite team, and the newspapers would mention it in a small article on page 12. Maybe they can even make a new hype out of it on social media, like that ice-bucket thing. Some sort of contest with people on the weirdest of places wishing death to all humanity, and whoever comes up with the most original photo or videoclip gets to choose the killing method. Yes, the Children of the Earth indeed. The times we lived; the fun we had!

 

As usual with conspiracy theories, there are many contradictory variations on the theory.

 

Of course: many minds means many points of view. This is common with all systems of thought. Unfortunately this particular field is replete with twisted minds and con-men, and therefore there exists a large spectrum of conflicting viewpoints and theories. The most obvious contradictions and wacko theories are purposely mixed in as counter-intelligence techniques by people who are paid to stir up movements and lead them astray. This has been proven in detail by Edward Snowden and others. Intelligence agencies all over the world have been doing this since their inception and all over the world. On the internet this even has become a lot easier. But at the core it’s really not about ‘theory’ at all. If you delve deeply enough into the conspiratorial morass you will find nuggets of information that you won’t ever find in the mainstream media and which are vitally important to understand what’s really going on in the world.

 

Much of the imagined evidence for the theory rests on the symbolism found on various items, such as the Great Seal of the United States and other items on the US one dollar bill, and their supposed connections with ancient symbols of evil or the Masons.

.

This little bit of shit that RationalWiki portrays as being the only evidence available is as we have seen quite dishonest and misleading. It’s a good propaganda-trick for people who are new to this material and curious or in doubt. But the sad thing is really, that by ostracizing themselves they in fact shorten the time for all of us to counter the agenda on time. There is in fact very much evidence available in literature and media, if you only understand what you are reading or watching. And, more importantly, get off your ass and actually look for it. You hadn’t seen any evidence before, simply because you hadn’t looked for it. Have you ever learned for instance a foreign language without reading books and trying and trying and trying? Just as with all real knowledge it costs effort, much of it. But we are now so far into the Agenda that it’s not very difficult anymore to see the most important proof; that what is happening right in front of your eyes. Use them! If you strip the conspiratorial literature and narrative of all of its 90% of bogus, you will lay bare a solid core based on facts that tell you exactly how we came to the situation we’re now facing and where we are going. Because the real investigative researchers have been warning us for decades about dangers, which even the most ardent Skeptics can’t possibly deny any longer:

YES, we are at the dawn of a new era of a more perfected totalitarian control system than has ever existed in our history. No, we as individuals have zero control over it and certainly not over how it will evolve further.

YES, Democracy is slowly but surely being abolished. It has always been a noble idea but in reality a farce in a mass civilization like ours, and it will be progressively phased out to make way for corporate governance. Democracy was never really meant to work, it is a temporary phase in a society, the phase before dictatorship.[52]

YES, all regular forms of money are on their way to be phased out and will be replaced for digital substitutes only. The timeframe is still hard to tell, but will become clear quite soon. The final system of money will be in the form of periodically provided electronic credits that will be given out through corporate-owned computers. It will be the end of personal wealth and the masses will be themselves ‘human capital’ to their overlords.

YES, national sovereignty is on its last legs and will also not survive another 20 years for many states and blocs in the world.

YES, we are on a crash course into World War III or at least some form of Clash of Civilizations. The scenario that was written on the fake letter from Pike to Mazzini certainly belongs to the possibilities in the future, but there are many more.

YES, a very large part of the people around you will be chipped within 10 to 15 years ahead. They won’t be coerced; they will stand in line for them, cheering! They will sneer at the ‘ancients’ who will still be offline. The first people that have their implanted microchip have already been on national TV in many countries, and many mainstream documentaries have been aired already to make it hip, to make it inevitable. Isn’t if fun that the Club of Rome is still at the forefront in order to help us making the “transformation”? The Club’s European Research Center actually says on their site that they are in “Need for a Big Shift”.[53] And a big shift it will be, when the main switch is pulled and countless little grey masses are rebooted and turned into nice moldable ‘blank slates’ again. Make up your own mind, or someone else will…

Yes; the wealth gaps are higher than ever and rapidly increasing, destroying that little bit of civilization we had. There is a ‘breakaway civilization’ of super-elites emerging that will have the possibility of total control over all others. Do they all want it? Nobody knows for sure. But history tells us that there’s always someone who wants it, always. It’s also quite possible that they won’t care and simply let us perish slowly.[54] If they succeed in chipping the world, people won’t be able to leave the area which they are assigned to, because their whole ability to move and consume will depend on the information and clearance in their chip.[55] As soon as this is accomplished, it’s all over for us. Simple as that.

 

Isn’t it cute then, that the Skeptics even in 2015 still manage to utter the following:

What’s taking so long?

Theories of a NWO have been going on for decades now. Conspiracy theorists say that they implement it slowly to make it less obvious.

 

It seems that they’re really stuck in their own kind of dreamworld, because they are unable to see the obvious. If you do a simple comparison with 20 or 30 years ago, it’s not that difficult to note that we have progressed a hell of a lot into exactly what the conspiracy ‘theorists’ have warned about. It’s funny and tragic at the same time to see how the die-hard Skeptics have closed their minds to such a degree that they are unable to see what is unfolding right before their eyes. The new feudal system that conspiracy researchers have been warning about for decades is emerging quickly and slowly becoming visible for most of us, and I only can hope for every reader to fully understand the implications of it. Here on Dutch television in December of 2014 the term “emerging feudal system” was actually used in a discussion among high bankers and economists! Read the book Tragedy & Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment [56] by Carroll Quigley to exactly learn how this was to come about. And there is no shadow of a doubt that this was started by secret societies like the Round Table Group, and implemented by the well-known Philanthropic Foundations and thousands of NGO’s worldwide; the post-democratic system that H.G. Wells, the Club of Rome and many many others have been writing about again and again.

The book A Brief History Of The Future by Jacques Attali can be classed as an insider treasure on par with the Quigley books and should be read too. It gives you a deep insight in the twisted world that the globalists are creating for us, and how they even make fun of it amongst each other. They laugh about how stupid we are in willfully taking their smart-toys which in reality are weapons against us. They also laugh about how the West and most of its population will be fleeced and taken down completely. This book explains in details how the feudal system Quigley wrote about will be completed, and it leaves no shadow of a doubt that we will be chipped and in the end rendered superfluous. In the coming 10 to 20 years a major part of the agenda will be pushed through and possibly completed. We’re looking onto at least another 20 years of intensifying international battle, according to for instance the study by a major British military think-tank which can be found through this London Guardian-article: Revolution, Flashmobs, And Brain Chips; A Grim Vision Of The Future. [57]

American historian Will Durant wrote in his very enlightening The Story Of Philosophy the complete societal plan Plato outlined for humanity. It gives us

problems reeking with modernity and contemporary savor: communism and socialism, feminism and birth-control and eugenics, Nietzschean problems of morality and aristocracy, Rousseauian problems of return to nature and libertarian education, Bergsonian elan vital and Freudian psychoanalysis — everything is here. […] And for a time the Communist Party which ruled Russia after the revolution of November, 1917, took a form strangely reminiscent of the Republic. They were a small minority, held together almost by religious conviction, wielding the weapons of orthodoxy and excommunication, as sternly devoted to their cause as any saint to his, and living a frugal existence while ruling half the soil of Europe. [58]

 

Reading books like these will be a life-changer. They will help you understand that the NWO-agenda hasn’t started somewhere in the 20th Century, but is in fact many of thousands of years old. It has slacked multiple times, but the outlines of the plan have been known since the beginning of Civilization. It seems it has no real ending and the beginning is shrouded by the mists of history. But at the end of Ages a preparation for the New Age is made centuries before the actual moment. Every Age gives a fresh start for the Dominant Minority of that time. We’re now living Between Two Ages, and unfortunately for us they mean serious business. The world for them actually is like a business; an Enterprise. Parts of their Enterprise have succeeded before; will it become in our time a success too?

People who close their eyes for this or who don’t care, have already made their choice. Unfortunately the moment quickly approaches where many people will literally become unable to make conscious choices for themselves. It will be an easy final choice for most: get yourself chipped or be left out of society altogether. The ‘I’ and your phone will merge into a literal I-Phone; you will become the android.

And if you only start to wake up while standing in line for your chip, then, unfortunately, it will be too late.

 

——————————————————————————————————

NOTES:

[1]  See here what they call their ‘Best Articles

[2]  Carl Sagan – The Demon-Haunted World  [Ballantine; 1996]  / p. 300

[3]  RationalWiki;  Carl Sagan; Quotes

[4]  RationalWiki;  Shoehorning

[5]  RationalWiki; New World Order. This article was accessed and saved on February 4, 2015. Textual differences in this article made after fall outside of my scope and responsibility. I have saved the article as PDF on February 4, which can be requested at any time though e-mail.

[6]  See article INTELLIGENCIA

[7] – Peter J. Kuznick – Beyond The Laboratory; Scientists As Political Activists In 1930s America  [University of Chicago Press; 1987]  / p. 48-51.  Butler publicly disavowed the Technocratic Movement with silly arguments, but reality showed otherwise.
– See also: David Adair – The Technocrats 1919-1967; A Case Study of Conflict and Change in a Social Movement  [Simon Fraser University; 1970]

[8]  ISGP – Pilgrims Society Members List:  Quote from the 1973 book ‘The Glory and the Dream, a Narrative History of America, 1932-1972′, by William Manchester, pages 67-68: “Nicholas Murray Butler told his students that totalitarian regimes brought forth “men of far greater intelligence, far stronger character, and far more courage than the system of elections,” and if anyone represented the American establishment then it was Dr. Butler, with his 34 honorary degrees, and his thirty year tenure as president of Columbia University.” (1957, Arthur M. Schlesinger, ‘The crisis of the old order, 1919-1933’, p. 204)

[9]  New York Times, May 27, 1915. Note the similarity of the title Civilization At The Breaking Point with Mankind At A Turning Point from the Club of Rome, one of the later proponents of Fabianism.

[10]  The capitalized use of both ‘World’ and ‘State’ is important here. For more information on the esoteric meaning of ‘State’, please see the article CLOSE TO PERFECTION.

[11]  Wikipedia; H.G. Wells Bibliography

[12]  H.G. Wells – Phoenix; A Summary Of The Inescapable Conditions Of World Reorganization
[Secker & Warburg, London; 1942]  / p. 88

[13]  H.G. Wells – Russia In The Shadows  [Doran, New York; 1978]  / p. 178

[14]  Arnold J. Toynbee – The Trend Of International Affairs Since The War
[International Affairs 1933, vol. X] / p. 808, 809

[15]  For an introduction into Fabian warfare see here.

[16]  H.G. Wells – Phoenix  / p. 181, 182. [Italics in original]

[17]  Wikipedia; Roman Mythology; Sacred Animals

[18]  Tobias Churton – The Magus Of Freemasonry  [Inner Traditions; 2006]  / p. 80

[19]  H.G. Wells – The New World Order  / p. 111

[20]  Wikipedia: Pukka Sahib

[21]   Wells – Phoenix / p. 124.

[22]  Brooklyn NY Daily Eagle, April 19, 1919

[23] See for instance: Short History of the development of English Freemasonry in Guyana 1780-2004.
Carnegie was revered in many Masonic circles. In 1905 he received a special decoration from high French aristocracy for his part in the “Great Work for International Peace”. He was also called a “Citizen of the World”, just as decades later the Rockefeller family started to award World Citizenship Awards. Carnegies triumph was featured in the New York Times, April 18, 1907.

[24]  Frederick Lynch – 1920 – Personal Recollections Of Andrew Carnegie  / p. 11, 12

[25]  New York Times, September 3, 1921

[26]  Read the poem here: Locksley Hall.   On Tennyson being a Freemason, see for instance this article in the Proceedings of the Masonic Poets Society #5.

[27]  Adam B. Ulam – The Rivals; America And Russia Since World War II
[Viking Press, New York; 1971]  / p. 105, 106

[28]  New York Sun, July 18, 1919

[29]  Wikipedia;  LeBaron Bradford Colt

[30]  George Bush’s NWO Speech

[31]  RationalWiki; Crank Magnetism

[32]  Paul Kennedy – Parliament Of Man; The United Nations And The Quest For world Government
[Allen Lane; 2007]  / p. 33

[33]  Oxford Dictionary; Conduct

[34]  Kennedy – Parliament Of Man  / p. 31, 32

[35] It might or might not surprise you to see that in Freemasonry this division in three legs on a three-legged stool also is made about the Craft. See for instance Errol Hinton – Freemasonry; A Three-Legged Stool? A short quote:
“Bro. Neddermeyer shows how the craft is divided into three groups. The first is the fraternal or social side of the Masonry. The second group focuses on the community action, and public giving. The third group exists to believe in the promotion of Masonic light and teaching. This group believes that we exist first and foremost to teach and learn Masonic principle as a way to better living and personal growth. As I reflect upon this I realize that Freemasonry is like a three-legged stool. When one leg is longer or shorter than the others, the whole stool is unbalanced. A challenge lies ahead of us because likeminded brethren join similar lodges. Thereby we get lodges that seem to “specialize” so to speak in different areas.”

[36]  Vassiliki Smocovitis – The Unifying Vision; Julian Huxley, Evolutionary Humanism,
And The Evolutionary Synthesis
  / p. 1

[37]  H.G. Wells – Mr. Britling Sees It Through

[38]  Alice Bailey – Externalization Of The Hierarchy

[39]  Alice Bailey – Esoteric Psychology II  / p. 652-655

[40]  Rogersville Review, Thursday June 22, 1944

[41]  Probably the most comprehendsive book availiable on the leader of the Bavarian Illuminati is
the book Perfectibillists  by Terry Melanson.

[42]  Brooklyn Daily Eagle, March 10, 1919

[43]  The American H.G. Wells Society; Introductory Article

[44]  H.G. Wells – Phoenix  / p. 183

[45]  New York Times, September 17, 1914

[46]  New York World, October 21, 1920

[47]  –

[48]  Carroll Quigley – The Anglo-American Establishment  [Books In Focus; 1981]  / p. 5

[49]  The Club Of Rome – The First Global Revolution  [Orient Longman; 1993]  / p. vii, 3

[50]  Ibid.  / p. 70-75

[51]  Wikiquote: Prince Philip, Duke Of Edinburgh

[52]  For more on this, see MOB FOOL

[53]  Club Of Rome, European Research Center

[54]  Hints for this scenario were given for instance in Jacques Attali – Millennium; Winners And Losers In The Coming World Order [1990]
Walter Russell Mead called the book “a description of the future by one of the men who will make it”.
Attali wrote on page 84:
“If the people of power in the emerging spheres of prosperity knew how to think in the long term, they would watch carefully the peripheries at their doors. In the coming world order, there will be winners and there will be losers. The losers will outnumber the winners by an unimaginable factor. They will yearn for the chance to live decently, and they are likely to be denied that chance. They will encounter rampant prejudice and fear. They will find themselves penned in, asphyxiated by pollution, neglected through indifference. The horrors of the twentieth century will fade by comparison.”
So far the happy liberal word state of perpetual peace, right?

[55]  In the 2011 movie In Time  by director Andrew Niccol a quite realistic depiction of this idea is given. In the movie it centers around time as credits, but in reality they plan for credits for purchasing and consuming. In the interview named Reflections And Warnings, the late movie director Aaron Russo told  Alex Jones that Nick Rockefeller personally said to him that they are planning to chip the world’s population. And if some individuals decided to be bad boys they would simply disconnect their chip, rendering them obsolete in society. It is difficult to say if Russo´s statements were true or not. He certainly befriended Nick Rockefeller years before that, but it almost seems too good to be true.

[56]  Download scanned copies here.

[57]  Revolution, Flashmobs, And Brain Chips; A Grim Vision Of The Future

[58]  Will Durant – The Story Of Philosophy  [Simon & Schuster; 1926]  / p. 20, 54